Refine search for Graphics

AMD ATI Radeon HD 4890 Review

Author Edward Chester
Published 2nd Apr 2009
Manufacturer ATI
Price £204.34 (Exc VAT)
as reviewed £234.99 (Inc VAT)
Latest Price
Features Score 7 for Features
Performance Score 7 for Performance
Value Score 8 for Value
Overall Score 8 for Overall
AMD ATI Radeon HD 4890
Bookmark and Share discuss this article  8 comments    Email  Email trustedreviews newslettersTrustedReviews Newsletters

It hardly feels like it but it's actually been nine months since AMD/ATI released its last single-chip high-end graphics card, the HD 4870. Now that may not be a great length of time in most walks of life but in the computer industry where we quite often see new releases every six months, that's quite a stretch. Nevertheless, ATI has today launched the HD 4870s successor, the single-chip HD 4890.


Available immediately and, in the case of the XFX card we're looking at, priced at £229.99, it's about the same as the HD4870 was at launch and £60 more expensive than the HD4870 1GB is currently. This makes its nearest competitor from nVidia, the GTX 260 and will immediately alert you to the fact this is not a card meant to compete at the bleeding-edge in terms of performance. Still £200 can get you a heck of a lot of bang for your buck so let's see how the HD 4890 holds up.


The card itself is outwardly very similar to the HD 4870 with the same 9.5in PCB length, identical dual slot cooler design, and same duo of extra power connections on its front edge. The video output configuration is also identical with two dual-link DVI sockets and a multi-format analogue output that natively supports S-Video but also outputs component and composite with the help of dongles. Meanwhile, the top edge of the PCB is home to the usual pair of Crossfire connectors.


Casting an eye over the specification of the actual graphics chip, reveals that the card looks pretty similar internally, as well. The HD 4890 still features 800 stream processors, 40 texture units, and 16 ROPs, communicating across a 256-bit wide interface to1GB of GDDR5 memory. However, this new chip has been completely reworked to enable it to run at higher clock speeds. Specifically, a ring of decoupling capacitors has been added round the whole chip to reduce signal noise and the relative timings of all the components have been tweaked.

The result isn't particularly dramatic with just a 100MHz (13 per cent) increase of core clock speed but along with faster memory it should result in a noticeable boost in performance. Consequently the transistor count has gone up slightly, from 956 million to 959 million, but the difference is likely to have a negligible impact on production, and thus final board, costs.


ATI has also focussed on making the new card less power hungry when idling. We couldn't get any specific details as to what measures had been taken to achieve this but ATI quotes that idle power has dropped from 90W on the HD 4870 to 60W on the HD 4890. Unfortunately this isn't something that's carried over to the card running at full pelt where the HD 4890 now consumes 190W, up from 160W on the HD 4870.

With so little changes to talk about we might as well get right onto testing.

 

Newsletters

Register to receive the latest Reviews and News Headlines directly to your Inbox every day, and enter our regular competitions. More Info.

Your Name


Email Address


Latest 4 of 8 Comments

Have your say: Leave a comment below about this article.

comment Sean Groarke said on 3rd April 2009

On the one hand I sympathise with the difficulty of getting all the elements of a comparative review lined up, but plenty of other review sites had 4890 versus GTX 275 ready on Day... more

comment stranded said on 4th April 2009

"...nothing revolutionary enough here to tempt me from my HD3870 :)"
"You do realise even the HD 4870 is significantly faster than the HD 3870?"
<... more

comment DrkZ said on 17th April 2009

So, whats better; HD 4870 or HD 4890?

comment Lucian Proctor said on 28th August 2009

Actually, you can reduce the memory clock manually at idle with CCC. It reduces the idle power by about 30 watts.

See all 8 comments on this article.

add comment Add your comment

You must be logged in to comment. Login or register here.