Refine search for Graphics

nVidia GeForce GTX 260

Author Edward Chester
Published 11th Jul 2008
Manufacturer Leadtek
Supplier Overclockers.co.uk
Price £174.99 (Exc VAT)
as reviewed £205.61 (Inc VAT)
Latest Price Click here
Features Score 9 for Features
Performance Score 8 for Performance
Value Score 9 for Value
Overall Score 9 for Overall
nVidia GeForce GTX 260
award recommended

Discuss this article  6 comments    Email this to a friend  Email this to a friend TrustedReviews NewslettersTrustedReviews Newsletters

The GTX 280 is, on average, the fastest single graphics card you can currently buy but it also comes with a seriously hefty price tag, which most of us would simply never consider stretching to pay. This fact was driven home with all the subtlety of a sledgehammer by ATI, just a week or so later, when it released its own brand new card, in the form of the HD 4870, and proved that great performance didn't have to cost the earth.

Were this the end of it, nVidia might have had a hard time for the next few months as the vast majority of people recognised the limited reason for paying an extra 40 per cent for only (on average) 10 per cent more performance. However, this isn't the end of it because nVidia also just released the GTX 260, which uses the same GT200 chip as GTX 280 but has a few bits of it disabled, so it's slightly slower, but most importantly it costs less. So let's see how it stacks up.

Click for full size
Click to enlarge

Apart from the slower clock speeds, the GTX 260 is essentially just a GTX 280 with two Texture Processing Units (TPCs) disabled and two ROP blocks also disabled. Because of the way the ROPs are linked to memory this also means the amount of onboard memory has also been reduced to 896MB and overall memory bandwidth has come down to 111.9GB/s.


As the GTX 260 uses the same GT200 chip found in the GTX 280, it's safe to assume that GTX 260s are being made from GT200 cores that have some slight defects. By disabling the defective area, the rest of the chip can still be used without any problems. This rescues revenue for nVidia from otherwise wasted chips and also provides us with cheaper cards that have close to the same performance. This is a theory that is reinforced when you look at the way GT200 is laid out.


The processing units and texture units are separated into distinct sections on the chip with each section working, in a sense, independently. So, if there is a problem in one of the sections of processing cores (the top left one, say), the associated (i.e. neighbouring) texturing units and ROPs can also be disabled without much difficulty.

I won't cover the intricacies of the GT200 architecture in this article, as you can read all about it in my GTX 280 review. Instead I'll move straight to looking at the card itself. And, of course, the performance figures after that.

 

Newsletters

Register to receive the latest Reviews and News Headlines directly to your Inbox every day, and enter our regular competitions. More Info.

Your Name


Email Address


Latest 4 of 6 Comments

Have your say: Leave a comment below about this article.

Comment kalniel said on 11th July 2008

Thanks.

Too many cards you say? Maybe I could help take care of one or two ;-)

Comment ilovethemonkeyhead said on 11th July 2008

i think the crossfire support thing might be the most defining feature in this battle. is there any information on how the GTX 260 performs overclocked against the HD 4870?

Comment Loggitt said on 12th July 2008

Overall your review is well done. However, your review doesn't fully address the running temperatures of the cards reviewed with a graph. Other reviews I've read are sh... more

Comment Ed said on 14th July 2008

Well, I was also concerned at the running temperatures of both ATI's cards but they seem perfectly stable. Also, if there was any real worry about the operating temperatures, ... more

See all 6 comments on this article.

Add Comment Add your comment

You must be logged in to comment. Login or register here.