Refine search for Graphics
RV770: AMD ATI Radeon HD 4870
| Author | Edward Chester |
| Published | 4th Jul 2008 |
| Manufacturer | HIS |
| Supplier | Scan |
| Price | £194.89 (Exc VAT) |
| as reviewed | £229.00 (Inc VAT) |
| Latest Price | Click here |
| Features | ![]() |
| Performance | ![]() |
| Value | ![]() |
| Overall | ![]() |

One of the headline features of R600 was its 512-bit wide ring-bus memory controller. This gave unprecedented memory bandwidth and was something ATI was very proud of at the time. However, it was a very silicon-expensive design that didn't use its resources very efficiently. So, for RV770, ATI has gone back to the drawing board and come up with a completely new (though actually fairly conventional) memory controller design.

A central hub allows memory to be accessed from any part of the chip but the actual controllers have been moved to the edge of the chip where they're next to the most memory-bandwidth hungry parts. For low memory usage parts like the CrossfireX interconnect and UVD2 controllers, memory access is handled directly by the hub. By combining this new configuration with the latest GDDR5 memory (at least for the HD 4870) ATI has reduced latency and increased bandwidth to a colossal 192GB/s - nearly twice that of R600.

Click to enlarge
Another key change in RV770 is the improved AA performance. ATI went back to the drawing board when designing the ROPs and in particular greatly increased dedicated AA hardware. On R600 and RV670, dedicated AA hardware was poor and AA more often than not was performed using the shaders, which had a massive impact on performance.
Energy efficiency has also been improved thanks to clock gating that reduces the clock frequency of the card when not gaming or doing intensive GPGPU work. It would seem these improvements work, as well...

Finally, let's finish our look at the features of RV770 with another one of those lovely overlaid die shots. As with the similiar shot we looked at of GT200, the unmarked section (in this instance coloured in orange) will be a miscellany of other control logic like the thread scheduler and raster setup.
Latest 4 of 13 Comments
Have your say: Leave a comment below about this article.
karakaan said on 7th July 2008
Ed said on 8th July 2008
Ah, that could be a bit of a problem. Dells are an absolute pig to work with.
Lostbok said on 14th July 2008
^^ wrt the Dell PSU prob - not sure about the Xeon's, some of the midi-tower cases still have the same footprint as a regular PSU, but just proprietary gaps for the kettle lea... more
Lostbok said on 14th July 2008
and thanks for the great review!!
As per DMN's comment, that X1950XTX-GDDR4 (me too!) is suddenly looking really long in the tooth :o)))
See all 13 comments on this article.
Add your comment
You must be logged in to comment. Login or register here.




13 comments
Email this to a friend
TrustedReviews Newsletters
Hmmm, thanks ED. The Dell manual's state GPU's upto 150W(supported) so I may be pushing it if you say it draws upto 200W. Upgrading Dell PSU's I don't think is ... more