Refine search for Graphics
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT, 2600 Pro, and 2400 XT
| Author | Edward Chester |
| Published | 16th Jul 2007 |
We used the full version of Call of Duty 2, patched to version 1.2 for our testing. All in game settings were set to their maximum apart from anisotropic filtering and anti-aliasing, which we varied for different portions of our testing. SLI optimisation was also turned off, as we weren't testing any dual card configurations.
Our benchmark is based on a custom demo that involves both indoor and outdoor scenes from one of the most intense sections of the game. Because the game is very texture heavy it really taxes the memory bandwidth of graphics cards which is why mid-range cards tend to struggle with it. Reducing in-game texture settings should result in improved performance.
We ran our tests twice, once with transparency anti-aliasing and once without to see how this advanced AA technique affected performance. The section of the game that our benchmark uses doesn't use many transparent textures so there shouldn't much impact on performance when turning this in. However, for completeness we've included these results. The lighter bars represent our results with it turned on.






Latest 2 of 2 Comments
Have your say: Leave a comment below about this article.
Jeremy Betteridge said on 25th October 2008
ChickPea said on 3rd March 2009
Would this be a suitable upgrade from an nVidia 5200? I have a customer whose daughter is starting to find that her card struggles with newer games. It has a d-sub out and is an ... more
See all 2 comments on this article.
Add your comment
You must be logged in to comment. Login or register here.


2 comments
Email
TrustedReviews Newsletters
Hi Edward, is there any real difference between the 2600XT/PRO if I am upgrading from an X600? I am on a Dell Dimension 9150, 3 yrs old. Thanks. Jerry