Home / Cameras / Camera / Fujifilm Finepix S2500HD

Fujifilm Finepix S2500HD review




Our Score:


User Score:

The likelihood of a compact camera matching up to the results of a DSLR are unlikely, but in bridge cameras the closest approximation can be found. Fujifilm has plenty of previous form in this area, producing a number of cameras that manage to combine a huge optical zoom in a relatively compact frame. The Finepix S2500 has 18x optical magnification, which is fairly impressive judging by the small body.

Fujifilm Finepix S2500HD front angle

Packing such a large optical zoom into a small body isn’t without its issues, as holding such a small camera steady for prolonged periods of time is often difficult, if not nigh on impossible. Because of this some form of stabilisation is required, which in the case of S2500HD is two-fold. The first is a mechanical, adjusting the sensor to any movement, and the second is ISO based, upping the simulated film speed. Both have their benefits and disadvantages, but the most significant verdict will be whether the images suffer from camera shake. The HD portion of the S2500HD’s name has some significance as well, as the movie mode is of the 720p resolution. Although many cameras offer this functionality having an 18x zoom to play with whilst recording is incredibly impressive.

With more pocketable compacts providing impressively high zoom lengths and DSLRs dropping in price at an incredible rate, the bridge camera has something of a battle on its hands to avoid being elbowed off the shelf. The Fujifilm S2500HD certainly has the specs and on-paper attributes to be an impressive example of a bridge model, but it remains to be seen whether it translates into real-world image quality.


June 18, 2010, 8:54 pm

Nicely judged review: 7/10 on Image Quality and 7/10 overall is an excellent start. Why did Fuji, who can produce far better image quality, bother developing this one? Likewise, why did they bother with those huge ISO possibilities at all?

I don't own a Fuji, and have not done so for many years, but I always thought a Fuji would be a dead cert for good Image Quality for the money. From now on I will be much more careful before advising the purchase of a Fuji before you review it.

Painful point: The English of this review is awful. That's as new to me as is poor IQ/money on a Fuji. We each have bad day's and writing have it's pit-falls... But that takes little away from such a useful review.

Tom MacFarlane

June 18, 2010, 10:04 pm

Just a quick point: aperture priority only offers two setting: f2.8 and f8, which I felt was a con.

Chris 14

June 20, 2010, 9:01 am

Something tells me this is a poor translation of a poor review originally written in German. Am I close? And Matt's job was to knock the sentences into some kind of order just to prevent them being pure garbage?


December 25, 2010, 9:27 pm


I agree poor English is annoying, to that end, I think you mean "We each have bad days and writing has its pitfalls…" lol

Judge not eh?

Was going to get this camera, but I think I'm gonna go for the Panasonic FZ38 as there doesn't seem to be any camera that can beat its picture quality.

comments powered by Disqus