Home / Computing / Printer / Epson Aculaser M1200 - Mono Laser Printer

Epson Aculaser M1200 - Mono Laser Printer review

By

Reviewed:

Summary

Our Score:

8

User Score:

Personal laser printers have the advantage of simplicity and small size. If you just need to print correspondence and your main concern is good text print, a small laser like Epson’s Aculaser M1200 can save a lot of money over an inkjet printer of equivalent speed.

Imagine a large bread loaf – a tin loaf with a smoothly domed top – and you’ve got the overall shape of the M1200, though it's twice the size. All in textured black, apart from the fold-up output tray, which is a sort of smoked olive colour, the printer has simple, practical lines.

A 150-sheet input tray folds down from its front and there's no paper cover provided, so you'll probably want to remove and store paper when not actually printing. With the two paper trays open, the printer doesn't look as neat, but it still has a smaller footprint than similar machines with more conventional tray arrangements.

There's no control panel on the printer, just a couple of large LEDs – one yellow, one blue – which indicate paper jams, covers open, power and print data being received. Given the simplicity of what the printer's being asked to do, these two indicators are adequate.

Just in case of a paper jam – though we saw none during testing – there's a hinged cover at the top, over the fuser and another at the front for cartridge access. At the back are sockets for USB and parallel ports, though the printer has no network connection.

Physical setup is straightforward, as the machine uses a two-part drum and toner cartridge, with the toner hopper clipping onto the back of the drum. Supplied as a single component, it slides easily into position behind the front panel cover.

Software installation is nearly as easy and drivers for both Windows and OS X are provided. Most Windows printer software installations are hampered by the auto-detection Windows uses when a new USB device is connected.

Why there can't be more collaboration between Microsoft and printer makers to resolve this confusion for customers is hard to fathom. Most often, as here, you have to cancel the Windows driver setup in favour of that from the printer maker. On other occasions, you have to sit through two sets of file copying, of the same files, because the two setup routines are out of sync.

morsch

February 2, 2010, 5:41 am

A friend of mine bought a similarly cheap mono laser printer recently (might even be this one, don't know the manufacturer), and the ozone emissions must be pretty terrible. Any word on that? I've never smelled ozone with my (quite cheap) Lexmark printer.

Jmac

February 2, 2010, 3:38 pm

A parallel port? Who thought that was a good idea? I haven't used a parallel port printer in at least 8 years, and pretty much no motherboard built in at least the last 5 years has a parallel port, while all have a multitude of USB ports. Surely they could have shaved a few pence off their bill of costs right there, which has got to be important in a super budget printer like this?

Ala Miah

February 2, 2010, 6:08 pm

It says 'USB Connection' on the 'Price and Running Cost' page so i'm guessing it has a USB port?





If it doesn't then this product isn't even worth looking at let alone reviewing it.

Jmac

February 2, 2010, 8:58 pm

@Ala Miah - It does have a USB port, but it apparently also has a parallel port. According to the article: "At the back are sockets for USB and parallel ports, though the printer has no network connection."

Ala Miah

February 2, 2010, 9:30 pm

@John McLean Ahh yes your right, my bad.





I might be buying one soon, but I hate printers in general because they stop working for whatever reason and are so diffuclt to fix. I mean how much do I spend fixing a £20-30 printer with a recommendation from trusted reviews?





£10, £20? a new one will cost me that much anyway.





This is the last printer I will buy.

Frankf9d

February 3, 2010, 6:12 am

@Ala Miah.


Mono laser printers are so simple there are neglible costs involved, ie unlikely to incur a repair bill.


"£10, £20? a new one will cost me that much anyway".


Blimey ! as much as £10 or £20 for a new one, yes that's too big a risk in these uncertain times, steer clear mate.

Ala Miah

February 3, 2010, 3:08 pm

@Frank I meant that much for the repair.

comments powered by Disqus