Go To Latest Video ReviewsSamsung NV100HD Comments
| Author | Cliff Smith |
| Published | 21st May 2009 |
| Manufacturer | Samsung |
| Price | £147.83 (Exc VAT) |
| as reviewed | £170.00 (Inc VAT) |
| Latest Price | Click here |
| Build Quality |  |
| Features | |
| Image Quality |  |
| Value | |
| Overall |  |
Comments for Samsung NV100HD
stranded said on 21st May 2009
GherkinG said on 21st May 2009
I'm still soldiering on with my 3.2MP Powershot A75! Almost no grain at higher ISOs. Remember when it was said that 6MP was all you needed for a A4 300dpi print?
lifethroughalens said on 21st May 2009
Ridiculous. I would not even bother reviewing these cameras any more, not until they make some claim of image quality improvement or noise reduction or make some other technological quantum leap. I mean, it's just a complete waste of time resources.
15MP in a cr@ppy compact camera with a hole the size of Paris Hilton's brain to get the light through...ain't gonna work! Anyone would be excused for thinking the only reason they're making the MP so large is so that they sell more hard drives needed to store the images!
Cliff Smith said on 26th May 2009
lifethroughalens - If I didn't review the less-than-perfect cameras, people wouldn't know not to buy them. However to be fair to Samsung, the NV100HD isn't really a "crappy compact". It is well made, has a lot of good features and performs well. It's really only that overcrowded sensor that lets it down. If it has the 10MP sensor from the NV9 ir would be a lot better.
Add Your Comment
Add your comment
You must be logged in to comment. Login or register here.
With 14MP, this sensor size and this price the camera should be real crap. I think 5MP would be a lot nicer.