Canon IXUS 980 IS Comments
| Author | Cliff Smith |
| Published | 13th May 2009 |
| Manufacturer | Canon |
| Price | £243.48 (Exc VAT) |
| as reviewed | £280.00 (Inc VAT) |
| Latest Price |
| Build Quality | ![]() |
| Features | ![]() |
| Image Quality | ![]() |
| Value | ![]() |
| Overall | ![]() |

Comments for Canon IXUS 980 IS
Carl Abudephane said on 13th May 2009
Geoff Richards said on 13th May 2009
@Carl - I can't speak for the 980 IS but I have my 960 IS right here, and that's definitely metal-bodied. It would imagine the 980 is too, since it's been something of an IXUS trait over the years, hasn't it??
Cliff Smith said on 14th May 2009
Carl - Yes, the body is definitely metal, Aluminium as far as I can tell. I tested it with a multimeter and it conducts electricity, but it is not magnetic. Science!
I'm expecting an IXUS 100 to arrive any day now, but in the meantime I've got the new PowerShot SX200 IS, which is looking very nice. Review coming next week.
Carl Abudephane said on 14th May 2009
Wow! Tested it with a multimeter! Now there's certainty for you! Many thanks for the confirmation of that and for the news of the Ixus 100. Strange really that up until the I'd clapped eyes on the 100, I thought the 980IS was sexy as hell and my favourite-looking Ixus so far; then the 100IS comes out, is the polar opposite of the 980 - slim & svelt versus curvy & 'fullsome', and to be honest I think it is nothing short of beautiful, a genuine piece of handheld metallic sculpture that I'm hoping takes great photos's to boot.
Keep up the good work, it's appreciated.
robincapper said on 16th May 2009
Cliff, Interesting review. I debated about getting a entry level DSLR or the 980. Portability + quality meant the 980 won as I like having a good camera that's always on hand. The only real design flaw I have found is it's one touch replay button sometimes gets bumped, in the bag, on leading to unintended battery drain.
http://rcd.typepad.com/personal/2009/05/trusted-reviews-my-canon-ixus-980.html
Ohmz said on 17th May 2009
@ Carl Abudephane, get a girlfriend man. :)
Carl Abudephane said on 17th May 2009
@ Ohmz, Ha!! Thanks for the heads-up! Just re-read my post and yep, it screams 'get a girlfriend/life'! Got the girlfriend, so obviously ...!
ChristianMonk3y said on 20th May 2009
Does this do geo tagging of photos?
Cliff Smith said on 20th May 2009
ChristianMonk3y - No.
Oliver Pate said on 20th May 2009
Hi Cliff.
After your positive comments I decided to order a Lumix dmc fx35 from an internet website. However, one week later the company have informed me they are out of stock of that specific model! Very frustrating. This has therefore given me the chance to rethink my options. I can pick up a Canon IXUS 980 for around £80 more than the Panasonic Lumix I am interested in. Would this be a better choice for the extra money? Bearing in mind I'm just looking for a simple,compact point and shoot camera that takes top quality images?
Kind regards
Olly
digitalife said on 20th May 2009
They're 'out of stock' because the FX40 is out now :) which I'm *guessing* will be just as good as this Canon.
Oliver Pate said on 20th May 2009
Okay i've been on Amazon all morning and am looking at purchasing either the IXUS 100, Lumix FX35 (as there are very few reviews of the FX40 + the lens on the 35 is supposed to be superb) or the slightly chunkier IXUS 980 (i am slightly put off by it's dimensions as I am looking for an alterantive to my superzoom)
Any suggestions on that little mix?
Olly
James said on 11th June 2009
It's just not wide enough - again Canon! I'd love to have this camera if it's range started at equiv 28mm - 25mm, but having 36mm is a joke for this day and age. This is why I'm probably going to get the Ixus 870IS.
Add Your Comment
Add your comment
You must be logged in to comment. Login or register here.





I don't mean to question your facts as you've obviously used it, but are you absolutely positive that the body is all-metal? I only ask as when I had a look at this camera recently, I was reasonably sure that it was plastic. It really did feel like plastic, look like plastic close-up and when I subsequently checked specs online with Canon's own blurbs, other ixus' had metal body mentioned in the specs, but notably not so for this camera.
Can you say for certain that it's metal?
Also, is a review for the stunningly gorgeous new ixus 100 IS due soon?