Refine search for Digital Cameras

Olympus mju 9000 Review

Author Cliff Smith
Published 11th Apr 2009
Manufacturer Olympus
Price £208.70 (Exc VAT)
as reviewed £240.00 (Inc VAT)
Latest Price
Build Quality Score 8 for Build Quality
Features Score 7 for Features
Image Quality Score 9 for Image Quality
Value Score 7 for Value
Overall Score 8 for Overall
Olympus mju 9000
Bookmark and Share discuss this article  7 comments    Email  Email trustedreviews newslettersTrustedReviews Newsletters

Over the next few pages we show a range of test shots. On this page the full size image at the minimum and maximum ISO settings have been reduced to let you see the full image, and a series of full resolution crops have taken from original images at a range of ISO settings to show the overall image quality. These ISO test images are shot indoors using reflected natural light for maximum consistency.




This is the full frame at 64 ISO.




Image quality is very good at 64 ISO.




Still no major problems at 100 ISO




Image quality is still pretty good at 200 ISO.




Noise is starting to creep in at 400 ISO, with colour distortions ans blotchy shade.




Major noise problems at 800 ISO.




At 1600 ISO the image quality has really fallen apart, with poor colour reproduction and little shadow detail.




This is the full frame at 1600 ISO.

Discuss this article  7 comments    email this article to a friend Email

Page: < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

 

Newsletters

Register to receive the latest Reviews and News Headlines directly to your Inbox every day, and enter our regular competitions. More Info.

Your Name


Email Address


Latest 4 of 7 Comments

Have your say: Leave a comment below about this article.

comment Ripsnorter said on 12th April 2009

@ Billy Rubin & S_p_i_d_e_r. Thank you both for that. Like I mentioned, I'm surprised interval timing is such a rare feature because it would seem to easy to implement. As... more

comment theimer said on 12th April 2009

Cliff, you talk about the focal range 28-200mm (35mm equiv.) across the entire review while the camera itself states that it has a 10x zoom, 5-50mm (35mm equiv. that should maybe b... more

comment Cliff Smith said on 19th April 2009

theimer - You're quite correct, it should be 28-280mm. I've edited the review to correct this error. Thanks for pointing it out.

comment PK Son said on 26th April 2009

ripsnorter : Most Nikon P&S can do it as well. The S series, specifically.

See all 7 comments on this article.

add comment Add your comment

You must be logged in to comment. Login or register here.