Refine search for Digital Cameras
Digital Cameras: A Buyer’s Guide v2.0
| Author | Cliff Smith |
| Published | 24th Feb 2009 |
Types of camera
Back when I wrote the original buyer's guide, I divided the camera market up into four basic categories; style cameras, compact cameras, bridge cameras and digital SLRs. While these categories still exist, the market has become more complex over the past couple of years, with several new types of camera emerging, and so this is the section that most needs to be updated.
At the lowest end of the market there are budget compacts. These typically cost under £100, and have very basic specifications. You'll usually find these types of cameras in supermarkets and mail-order catalogues. Often they are from obscure brands that you've never heard of, but many of the major manufacturers also have a series of budget models holding up the bottom end of their product lines.

In most cases, budget cameras have cheaply-made plastic cases, very basic 3x zoom lenses, and use components that are a couple of years behind the cutting edge of digital camera technology. LCD monitor screens are typically small and quite low resolution and overall performance can be very slow, often with unreliable autofocus and very poor low-light capability. Picture quality is also extremely variable, even in the case of some well-known brand names. In some cases you'll get better picture quality from the camera in your mobile phone.

Although these sorts of cameras are OK if all you're looking for is something cheap, and you're not too worried about picture quality, for example for updating a blog, but generally they are best avoided. While the low price may make them see like a bargain, the low image quality and poor performance will quickly prove frustrating, and you can get a much better camera by spending about £20-£30 more.
Latest 4 of 10 Comments
Have your say: Leave a comment below about this article.
D. P. Rangan said on 26th February 2009
Cliff Smith said on 4th March 2009
That's cerainly an important point, Mr. Rangan. From now on I'm going to add a figure for pixel density to the features table whenever possible.
Splogbust said on 5th March 2009
Interesting and informative review - I thought it was going to be one of those articles that recommend the reviewers favourites.
A few comments:
1. Why, in this age ... more
Splogbust said on 5th March 2009
Oh, and another point on sensor size. I didn't find this mentioned but may have missed it. The smaller the sensor, the greater the depth of field (circles of confusion stuff... more
See all 10 comments on this article.
Add your comment
You must be logged in to comment. Login or register here.


10 comments
Email
TrustedReviews Newsletters
Dear Editor,
All the points you have brought out are relevant. You should also give a good idea about sensor size, how to assess it and how it affects the uoti... more