Refine search for Digital Cameras

Casio Exilim EX-Z85 Review

Author Cliff Smith
Published 20th Feb 2009
Manufacturer Casio
Price £86.96 (Exc VAT)
as reviewed £100.00 (Inc VAT)
Latest Price
Build Quality Score 9 for Build Quality
Features Score 8 for Features
Image Quality Score 6 for Image Quality
Value Score 8 for Value
Overall Score 8 for Overall
Casio Exilim EX-Z85
Video Review click here
Bookmark and Share Watch video review  Watch Video Review    discuss this article  3 comments    Email  Email trustedreviews newslettersTrustedReviews Newsletters

A range of general test shots are shown over the next two pages. In some cases, the full size image has been reduced for bandwidth purposes, and a crop taken from the original full resolution image has been placed below it to show the overall image quality. Some other pictures may be clicked to view the original full-size image.




Click for full size
Click to enlarge

Here's the usual detail test shot of the West Window of Exeter Cathedral, for you to compare with other cameras. See below for a full res crop, or click to see the whole picture.





As you can see the Z85 has real problems with the fine detail. The anti-bird netting is barely visible due to image noise.Compare it with the 10 megapixel Pentax M60, which is about the same price.





The Casio's lens produces quite a lot of barrel distortion at wide angle.





Centre sharpness insn't too bad, but I've seen better.





Corner sharpness is terrible, but at least there's not much chromatic aberration.



 

Newsletters

Register to receive the latest Reviews and News Headlines directly to your Inbox every day, and enter our regular competitions. More Info.

Your Name


Email Address


Latest 3 of 3 Comments

Have your say: Leave a comment below about this article.

comment jerrold Bernstein said on 22nd February 2009

close to being the perfect compact camera YET it is let down by inferior image quality?? Gimme a break.

Jerry

comment Steve said on 22nd February 2009

I bought this camera for my Mum as a Xmas present and thought the photo quality was fantastic for such a cheap camera.

I got vastly better results than the examples ... more

comment AndyfromVA said on 22nd February 2009

To my eyes the image quality is terrible - worse than a 6, probably a 4. Due to the poor image quality and absence of an AF assist lamp, the most I'd give it, overall, would ... more

See all 3 comments on this article.

add comment Add your comment

You must be logged in to comment. Login or register here.