Refine search for Digital Cameras

Fujifilm FinePix J50 Review

Author Cliff Smith
Published 1st Jul 2008
Manufacturer Fujifilm
Price £86.09 (Exc VAT)
as reviewed £99.00 (Inc VAT)
Latest Price
Build Quality Score 8 for Build Quality
Features Score 3 for Features
Image Quality Score 4 for Image Quality
Value Score 6 for Value
Overall Score 6 for Overall
Fujifilm FinePix J50
Bookmark and Share discuss this article  1 comment    Email  Email trustedreviews newslettersTrustedReviews Newsletters

The J50 is a very simple camera, and apart from its longer zoom range and relatively large monitor it doesn't have much in the way of features. In fact it's the only camera I've seen recently that doesn't even have face detection. Shooting modes are limited to an all-auto mode in which all user input except for image size and continuous mode are disabled, a basic portrait mode which warms skin tones, a baby mode which is the same but without the flash, a "picture stabilisation" mode which simply boosts the ISO setting to produce faster shutter speeds, and a red-eye reduction mode that uses a pre-flash to minimize the demonic effect of flash reflecting from peoples' eyes.


One unusual feature is the digital zoom mode. Rather than the usual arrangement where digital zoom is activated by the zoom control after maximum optical zoom is reached, on the J50 there is a setting on the mode dial that applies 3x digital zoom regardless of the optical zoom setting.


As well as the main shooting modes, there is a also a scene mode with 13 settings, including a "manual" mode which is really just a basic program auto with the usual adjustable white balance, exposure compensation and ISO setting, although the ISO range of 100-800 is very limited. Also limited is the movie mode, which is only capable of 320 x 240 resolution at 30fps. In fact the overwhelming impression I got from using the J50 was of a camera that was two or three years behind the current market.

 

Newsletters

Register to receive the latest Reviews and News Headlines directly to your Inbox every day, and enter our regular competitions. More Info.

Your Name


Email Address


Latest 1 of 1 Comments

Have your say: Leave a comment below about this article.

comment AndyfromVA said on 3rd July 2008

The image "quality" is truly terrible on the J50. Interesting because in your recent review of the J10, the image quality was much better, something you wouldn't ex... more

See 1 comment on this article.

add comment Add your comment

You must be logged in to comment. Login or register here.