Refine search for Digital Cameras
Fujifilm Finepix S8100fd
| Author | Jamie Harrison |
| Published | 14th May 2008 |
| Manufacturer | Fujifilm |
| Price | £191.49 (Exc VAT) |
| as reviewed | £225.00 (Inc VAT) |
| Latest Price |
| Features | ![]() |
| Image Quality | ![]() |
| Value | ![]() |
| Overall | ![]() |
Comments for Fujifilm Finepix S8100fd
AndyfromVA said on 30th June 2008
Andy said on 30th June 2008
Well, I'd probably agree that the review is a little harsh, but it seems to me the s8100fd doesn't really add that much over the s8000fd save for an extra 2MP and a quick digital zoom feature. Given that the 10MP is achieved on the same sensor as the 8MP S8000 it's only going to have a negative effect on image quality, while digital zoom sucks.
As such, if you're after some advice, I'd go for the s8000fd instead and save yourself £60 - it's only £140 on Amazon atm. It's exactly what I've just done. :)
keith chowney said on 24th July 2008
i agree with the review on the s8000 i have had one for 3 months and it is great
build quality,features and pictures.
Ian Porter said on 5th August 2008
I currently own a Fuji S7000 and recently thought of upgrading as I have been very pleased with it but want more features. When I read the specification and casual reviews of the S8100FD I was quite excited, however on reading this review it completely changed my mind... until I read all three comments above. Thanks for the advice everybody, I think there is an S8000 somewhere with my name on it :)
Keith Wild said on 1st September 2008
I have just recently bought this camera and whilst some of the features were good the colour imaging was very poor.Deep crimson reds came out pink and compared to my other cameras and even phone they did not replicate the true colours. My other cameas are Samsung GS 1X, Nikon S1 and Kodak Z740.I have looked at other cameras of this kind and can say the Nikon P80 and the Lumix DMC FZ28 are more accurate in there colour definition. Needless to say I have returned the Fuji and i am now looking for an alternative.
Clare J said on 22nd September 2008
Eek. I am looking for a camera to use for gig photography as a step up from my compact, but am not ready for a full SLR, so was hoping to find a good superzoom digital. I'm really struggling to decipher which of these is likely to perform well in low light. I too had been drawn in by the features of this model, but now put off by the review. Does anyone know how the S8000 stands up in such conditions?
Add Your Comment
Add your comment
You must be logged in to comment. Login or register here.




I find this review perplexing, to say the least. TR gave an excellent review to the S8000fd and awarded it a 9 out of 10, something that does not happen very often. Yet the S8100fd gets a horrible score of 6 out of 10. Such a disparity must mean that the newer S8100fd is much worse than the S8000fd in many ways. However, your reviewer did not give one example of this. In fact the only reference he makes to the S8000fd is in his introduction. I realize that Cliff did the review of the S8000fd but I'd have hoped that Mr. Harrison would have made an effort to conform his review to Cliff's. As someone who is considering the purchase of a superzoom, I can't give any consideration to this review. Too bad, as I usually give great weight to TR's reviews. Honestly, I think you owe your readers, and Fujifilm, another review of the S8100fd, hopefully by Cliff.