Refine search for Digital Cameras

Samsung S85 Review

Author Cliff Smith
Published 16th Oct 2007
Manufacturer Samsung
Price £86.95 (Exc VAT)
as reviewed £99.99 (Inc VAT)
Latest Price
Features Score 8 for Features
Image Quality Score 8 for Image Quality
Value Score 10 for Value
Overall Score 8 for Overall
Samsung S85
Discuss this article  5 comments    Email this to a friend  Email this to a friend TrustedReviews NewslettersTrustedReviews Newsletters

Fortunately things start to pick up a bit when we move on to the S85's performance. It starts up in a very creditable 1.8 seconds, and shuts down again in just over two. The autofocus system is very fast even in relatively low light, and in single-shot mode its shot-to-shot cycle time is an exceptionally quick 1.6 seconds. In continuous shooting mode it can manage approximately one frame per second, but although the initial shutter press makes the normal sound there is only a very quite ticking noise to indicate when subsequent shots are being taken. Low light performance is also very good, thanks to an AF assist lamp with a range of approximately two metres. Focusing in low light is either very fast, or if it can't focus it lets you know very quickly. Flash range is a little below average at three metres, but frame coverage is excellent and the flash recharge time of approximately five seconds is also fairly good. Battery performance will of course vary depending on the type and quality of the batteries used, but I took over a hundred shots with a pair of standard alkaline batteries and the battery level meter didn't budge from reading a full charge.



The good news continues when we look at image quality, which is outstanding for such a low cost camera. Exposure and colour rendition were virtually perfect, and even when shooting directly into bright sunlight the sensor managed to capture plenty of shadow detail. The lens may not have the Schneider-Kreuznach brand name, but it is very high quality nonetheless, producing excellent centre sharpness and very little barrel distortion at wide angle, with only a little softness and a small amount of chromatic aberration around the edges of the frame. Image noise was extremely well controlled at all ISO settings, with good picture quality at ISO 800 and a usable image even at ISO 1600, which is a very impressive performance by any standard. For a camera costing under £100 it is nothing short of remarkable.



Verdict
The Samsung S85 may look a little dull, but it is a well-made camera with a useful range of features, very good performance and surprisingly excellent picture quality. It has a few odd quirks and is a bit fiddly to operate, but considering the sub-£100 price tag it represents astonishing value for money.

 

Newsletters

Register to receive the latest Reviews and News Headlines directly to your Inbox every day, and enter our regular competitions. More Info.

Your Name


Email Address


Latest 4 of 5 Comments

Have your say: Leave a comment below about this article.

Comment Bev said on 10th September 2008

Camera picture quality is great, but mine stopped working after 2 months and custommer support is terrible. They are trying to charge £35 for repaire and handling, the camera only ... more

Comment Denis Swift said on 24th September 2008

Suggestion for Bev: It's pretty obvious that your camera had an inherent fault right from the start. So you're covered by the Sale Of Goods Act (an item must be suitabl... more

Comment James Mills said on 25th September 2008

Mine also broke after 3 months. It completely locked up and was sent back to Samsung via Comet. 6 weeks later and I have finally managed to get a refund from Comet as Samsung are c... more

Comment john whale said on 19th January 2009

i bought a samsung 6mp camera 2 years ago, it takes great pictures and i have had no problems with it.
despite owning a sony a200 and a nikon d40, i still use the samsung ve... more

See all 5 comments on this article.

Add Comment Add your comment

You must be logged in to comment. Login or register here.