Intel: 32nm Development Complete Comments
| Author | Hugo Jobling |
| Published | 11th Dec 2008 |
Comments for Intel: 32nm Development Complete
John McLean said on 11th December 2008
Amir said on 11th December 2008
smart choice.
nothing lasts in the present
Pbryanw said on 11th December 2008
Well put Amir, and a very Buddhist philosophy (impermanence that is)
Anyway, it doesn't seem that long ago we were looking forward to 45nm processors (is 42nm a mistake?) so it seems that nothing waits for technology.
Add Your Comment
Add your comment
You must be logged in to comment. Login or register here.


Excellent news. I always go for the "tick" CPUs over the "tock" ones - by the time the die-shrink for the tick comes along the architecture has generally been through a few steppings and optimisations, you avoid the early adopter price of buying into a new architecture, software has had a chance to be developed which takes advantage of optimisations in the architecture over previous architectures so you really get to see the benefits, and you should get power and heat savings due to the smaller process. Win-win-win-win-win