1 of 24 pictures
Was giving 7/10 it for image quality another April Fool joke?
Good to read a review that takes into account the price and the target market of the camera. The mark-down on build quality is well-deserved: there is no excuse for making plastic mouldings that do not meet and hold neatly and firmly. Canon have made a minuscule and inappropriate "economy" on that one, even at this price point.
"There are much better cameras available for just £20 more"
What are they? I have the impression that you have taken this test a mistake and you are not able to evaluate it through. You have made some macro photography? You have compared the series of the same Canon 2000 and 3000? The A490 has superb image quality and superior digital cameras that constantly 4 -5 times as much. I'm sorry, but if you make these comparisons do not mind that it is a camera for 50 euros, you can not judge it. For me it is a 10/10
Update: 19 of the best cameras on sale right now, of every size, type and price
Which is the best DSLR camera on the market? We look at the top models available.
A round up of the best waterproof, shockproof, and generally all-round bombproof 'tough' compact digital cameras currently available.
More Camera Round-ups
Sign up for the
TrustedReviews email newsletter
Get TrustedReviews' award-winning reviews, opinions and advice delivered to your inbox for free!
Plus get great deals and exclusive offers from Time Inc. (UK) Ltd and its partners.
Trusted Reviews is part of the Time Inc. (UK) Ltd Technology Network