Home / Cameras / Camera / Canon EOS 70D / Design and Performance

Canon EOS 70D: Design and Performance

By Phil Hall



Our Score:


Canon EOS 70D: Design

Much of the 70D's design is similar to its predecessor, but there are some notable changes.

The biggest of these changes are found on the rear of the camera, where there's a revised control layout. Live view activation and video control is now accessed through a refined live view switch complete with start-stop button in the centre. The menu and info buttons have moved, too, towards the top left of the camera's rear much like the Canon EOS 700D.

If you're familiar with the triple-digit series of Canon then you'll notice that the 70D is substantially larger with a more substantial hand grip. As a result, the 70D feels more comfortable in the hand and better balanced, especially when using larger lenses.

As mentioned, the 70D shares a lot of its design characteristics with its predecessor, although it is slightly less wide. The body is constructed from a combination of conductive fibre and polycarbonate resin, and it certainly feels solid. It's not too far off of the 7D in terms of feel and handling, although it is lacking the weather resistance.

It's worth noting that the controls have been streamlined somewhat. Dedicated scene modes have been removed from the mode dial, giving the camera a more advanced feel, with the PASM controls taking precedence.

Canon EOS 70D: Performance

In general, the Canon EOS 70D delivers the kind of performance you would expect from a double digit Canon DSLR, with certain areas which are particularly impressive.

One such area is the camera's touchscreen performance. Canon was the first manufacturer to transfer touchscreen technology across to its range of DSLRs, and this heritage is starting to pay off with some impressive performance.

The capacitive screen is the same as found in the 700D and performs similarly well. Only light touches are needed to control the screen, while functionality such as touch focus through live view is welcome.

In fact, you can access almost any camera control through the touchscreen, and in combination with the various controls around the 70D's body the overall handling experience is pleasing.

In terms of image review and framing, the screen itself is impressive. The vari-angle hinge allows for viewing at a host of different shooting situation, which is damn useful, while the screen also offers a wide viewing angle and pleasing levels of saturation and contrast.

The viewfinder, meanwhile, offers a 98% field of coverage. Although this is more than the 96% of the 60D, it's unfortunately less than the D7100's 100% field of view. One nice feature, however, is a useful electronic overlay that displays the model's AF modes and allows you to toggle through them to select the desired setting.

On the subject of AF performance, it's worth considering the effectiveness of the new dual-pixel technology. When shooting using live view, the AF performance is a huge improvement on any DSLR that we've seen to date.

When the light begins to drop the AF performance does begin to slow, and certain CSCs' live view AF performance is comparable (if not more impressive) but it is vastly improved on its predecessor.

Canon EOS 70D

As more DSLR photographers are becoming accustomed to shooting in live view the improved performance will no doubt be welcome, although the good news is that the 70D's general AF performance is also improved.

The new 19-point AF system might appear to be some way behind the Nikon D7100's 51-point AF system, for example, but it does have the benefit of all points being cross-type. As a result, it offers good focus sensitivity in the centre of the frame, and even in poor lighting conditions.

There is a slight bias towards the centre of the frame, with subjects to the edges sometimes requiring a refocus before shooting. It's also worth nothing that if you use either Canon's USM or STM lenses then the focus system as a whole is almost silent.

Canon EOS 70D

There is a slight gripe with the Canon EOS 70D's performance, and that lays with the camera's Creative Filters. Unfortunately, the filters can only be applied when shooting just JPEG files, rather than Raw and JPEG, while it's also the case that you have to be shooting in live view to be able to access the filters.

While the filters themselves are solid, it's unfortunate that their functionality is limited by these two slight quirks in the 70D's operation.


September 6, 2013, 9:30 pm

Who ever even uses the "creative filters" anyway? Anyone who shoots RAW would have no need for them at all!


September 6, 2013, 10:15 pm



September 9, 2013, 9:12 am

What ISO are the sample photos in the gallery?


September 10, 2013, 7:20 am

See, now I'm in a quandary. I want to upgrade my ageing 7D, and was strongly tempted to pick up a 5DIII, but with the new live view AF features, the 70D is a compelling choice for video, and the pop-up flash, wi-fi and articulated screen give it a lot of flexibility. I only shoot in RAW, so obviously no interest in creative filters, but there are some features here that are very attractive indeed. Image quality, weather sealing and low light performance obviously won't touch the 5DIII with its full frame sensor, but I wonder if the 70D would be "good enough" to justify deferring my move up to full frame until the 5D Mk IV arrives (whenever that may be), inevitably bringing dual-pixel AF to the full frame range.

Don Carlson

September 16, 2013, 8:52 pm

Interested in Canon EOS 70D. Confused by your review comments in "Verdict."

Please explain:

“Canon EOS 70D
Throughout the lower end of the ISO range the EOS 70D manages to resolve more
detail than it's main competitor, the Nikon D7100, while even at higher ISO
settings it still delivers a good level of detail.”


“However, when it comes
to headline resolution – as well as some other elements of it's specification –
it is still behind the Nikon D7100.”


September 23, 2013, 12:35 pm

I own the 5D Mark III and cannot recommend it highly enough. I also own the 7D and am disappointed with it. It does not compare to the 5D. However, I shoot predominantly landscapes with a lot of wide angle shooting (14mm). If you want to photograph this type of thing I would recommend the full frame. However, if you are not into wide angle shooting then the 70D may be a better solution. It all depends on the type of photos you tend to take. If you shoot a lot of low light shots you will also want the 5D Mark III.


September 30, 2013, 7:18 am

Thanks MarLo. I shoot a lot of street scenes, handheld with available light, and the 5D Mk III's low light capabilities have been tempting me for some time. But it has to be a "do everything" for me - I want to be able to shoot wildlife, weddings, the whole lot. I'm not overly swayed by the price (happy to spend the extra for the 5DIII if it's the right body for me) but I am a little torn by the 70D's dualpixel live view for video, which I'm sure will hit the next gen of 5D, so the question is whether to hang on for that or bite now and accept that I'm going to feel the need to upgrade in a couple of years. Decisions, decisions...

comments powered by Disqus