Home / TVs & Audio / Projector / BenQ W1500 / Performance and Conclusion

BenQ W1500 - Performance and Conclusion

John Archer

By John Archer



Our Score:


BenQ W1500 - Frame Interpolation

In some ways, though, the most impressive aspect of the W1500’s performance is its motion reproduction. There’s practically no sign of the fizzing, dotting noise – even over skin tones – commonly witnessed with single-chip DLP projectors, and nor is there anything like as much judder or stuttering as we might have expected. It should be stressed, moreover, that the BenQ W1500’s surprisingly crisp, natural motion handling is achieved without needing to use the provided motion processing.

This frame interpolation processing if you do want to experiment with it is a little cleverer than might have been expected. If you stick with its lowest power level it keeps unwanted side effects reasonably low while removing practically all judder. It can make any grain that might be in a source image look a little unnatural though, so personally we’d recommend leaving Frame Interpolation off.

BenQ W1500

BenQ W1500 - 3D Performance

Trying the W1500 out with a few 3D Blu-rays uncovers one of the weirdest 3D experiences we’ve ever had. The first odd thing that happens is that when it detects a 3D input, the projector suddenly emits a really loud whirring noise that initially made us fear the projector had gone wrong. But eventually this settles down ahead of the 3D pictures belatedly appearing on screen.

Also odd is the extremely red saturation of the 3D pictures if you look at them without wearing BenQ’s glasses. We’re used to some degree of colour saturation adaptation with 3D, but we’ve never seen anything as extreme as this red undertone before. Donning the glasses does thankfully see the vast majority of this red infusion ‘corrected away’, but a tinge of it does remain visible during really dark 3D sequences. You can just about calibrate this redness away via the colour management system, but this can also see reds in the main pictures becoming a little washed out.

The most alarmingly bizarre thing about the W1500’s 3D pictures though, is their borked depth handling. They frequently seem to get 3D depths wrong, with some background objects seeming to exist in the foreground and vice versa. This makes the sense of space inconsistent and proves hugely tiring on your eyes, which are forever trying to refocus themselves to get things in the perspective your brain knows you should be seeing.

BenQ W1500

We hoped that adjusting the image’s 3D Sync Invert setting might fix the problem, but no; if anything our eye ache got even worse.

We should add, too, that during our tests the 3D glasses seemed to suffer the occasional sync glitch during our tests, causing a momentary but still distracting ‘twitch’ in the image.

Colours are punchy in 3D mode, brightness levels remain high despite the dimming effect of BenQ’s surprisingly ‘serious’ (in their design) glasses, crosstalk ghosting noise is almost completely avoided (as we’d expect given that the W1500 uses a ‘triple flash’ 3D playback system), detail levels are high, and motion is pleasingly free of the overt jerkiness that afflicts many 3D displays. But all this good work is totally undone by the inexplicable depth effect flaws.

BenQ W1500 - Wireless Video Performance

We haven’t yet discussed the W1500’s wireless HDMI system, so let’s put that right now. There are three elements we need to consider here: whether there’s any sign of compression in the wireless signal, how stable/noise-free the connection is, and how much input lag – if any – it introduces to proceedings.

So far as the quality of the signal is concerned, all seems well. There are no obvious signs of compression or signal disruption, even with 3D sources or if you wander around right in front of the projector. The only regular problem we had was that the projector didn’t always handshake properly using the wireless system with our Panasonic Blu-ray player, sometimes requiring us to power down and back up either the Blu-ray player or the projector before a connection was established.

As for lag, bizarrely the wireless system seems to cause LESS lag than using a direct HDMI cable! With the wireless system we recorded a lag figure of 65ms on average, whereas this lifted to a disappointingly high 100ms plus using a cable.

Given the rather open design of the W1500’s fan cooling system, we were concerned before firing it up that it might run very noisily. But actually it’s pretty quiet in Eco lamp mode, and while volume levels certain ratchet up quite a bit in 3D mode, when the lamp switches to its brightest output, it's still far from unbearably loud.


While it’s certainly not a bad projector in 2D mode, nor is BenQ’s W1500 the step-up hero we’d hoped for. For us, its quality leap from BenQ’s cheaper models isn’t quite extensive enough to justify a £1,400 price tag – especially as the 3D playback on the sample we tested is an eyestrain-inducing disaster.

Overall Score


Scores In Detail

  • 2D Image Quality 7
  • 3D Image Quality 4
  • Design 7
  • Features 9
  • Value 7


June 11, 2013, 2:45 pm

I cant believe that this reviewer did not realize that he was testing this projector with the old Benq glasses that do not support 144kz. That is why there is a problem with 3d.
Hope this review gets revised with the right glasses.


August 29, 2013, 2:14 am

it said the unit came with a pair of 144Hz active shutter, so where does it say he was using the wrong ones?


October 20, 2013, 12:31 am

"144Hz 3D. Many DLP Link 3D glasses top out at 120Hz, which was the maximum synchronization rate for a lot of first- and second-generation 3D projectors. The W1500 runs at 144Hz, so these slower glasses will not work. While the new glasses are not too much more expensive than the old ones, it is one additional thing that can go wrong when attempting to purchase your complete 3D system. At least one review rolling around criticizes the W1500's (excellent) 3D capabilities because the reviewer accidentally used a pair of 120Hz glasses to do their evaluation"(Retrieved from Projectorcentral.com).


October 20, 2013, 5:44 pm

He doesn't. But another reviewer (Bill Livolsi) claims that's
happened, without mentioning Archer's name. Livolsi says 'another
reviewer' used 120 Hz glasses instead of 144Hz. Doing searches for reviews, I only found Archer's to be critical of the 1500's 3D ability.


December 25, 2013, 2:05 am

Hi, I'm just publishing our review of the W1500. I've used the provided (144 hz) 3D glasses, and have found nothing weird. I have old BenQ glasses here, too, though, and they barely work, so I tend to agree that most likely the glasses were responsible for the issue. If there's one issue with the 3D, it's that you tend to notice that the blacks are a little dark red. That's very DLP-link, and one more great reason to move to RF 3D glasses on those projectors that give you the option, or are already standardized on the newer types.


March 8, 2014, 1:18 am

I recently purchased the W1500. In 2D it is hands down superb. Bright, clean, sharp imaging. Wonderful! However, I have consistently experienced some 'unusual' issues with 3D Blu Rays. I use a PS3 for Blu Ray playback. When I insert and begin playing a 3D disk, the projector switches to 3D and runs through a 'test' mode before the disks menu appears. This takes several seconds but is normal. The issue that arises though is that when I proceed to play the movie itself, the resulting 3D playback has some significant depth of field issues that frankly make it horrible and pretty much impossible to watch. The eye is extremely confused by what is being projected. It has nothing to do with the 'invert' option (I have tested this option several times in the projectors 3D menu) as there is some sense of correctness about the image, but it is barely watchable due to the above mentioned depth issues. The only way I have found to correct the issues is that while the actual 3D movie is playing, I must switch the projector off (which takes a minute or 2 while it cools) then switch it back on while the ACTUAL movie is paying, at which point the projector runs through it's test mode again. The resulting 3D image is now correct and perfectly watchable. I have tested with several disks and 2 separate 3D glasses (one of which is the Benq glasses that came with the projector) and the problem is consistent. I am in the process of contacting Benq to see if they have a resolve for this, but wondered if others had experienced the same problems as 3D issues are commonly reported in other reviews for this projector.

comments powered by Disqus