Home / Computing / Monitor / Asus ROG Swift PG348Q

Asus ROG Swift PG348Q review



1 of 4

Asus ROG Swift PG348Q 7
  • Asus ROG Swift PG348Q 7
  • Asus ROG Swift PG348Q 1
  • Asus ROG Swift PG348Q 5
  • Asus ROG Swift PG348Q 9


Our Score:



  • Great image quality
  • Outlandish, versatile design
  • Nvidia G-Sync
  • Huge size and resolution


  • Expensive
  • Cheaper rivals have the edge on quality
  • Awkward to build and set up

Key Features

  • 34in 3,440 x 1,440 IPS display
  • 50Hz over HDMI
  • 100Hz over DisplayPort
  • 1 x HDMI 1.4
  • 1 x DisplayPort 1.2
  • 1 x audio jack
  • 4 x USB 3
  • Manufacturer: Asus
  • Review Price: £1,000.00

What is the Asus ROG Swift PG348Q?

The latest screen from the Asus Republic of Gamers range is a monster. The PG348Q has a 34in diagonal and a 3,440 x 1,440 resolution, and the vast number of those pixels are stretched around a curved IPS panel. Nvidia G-Sync is present, too, alongside true 10-bit technology and flashing, customisable lights.

This monitor has every feature going, but for that you'll have to pay a princely £1,000. That’s uncharted territory for a gaming screen – it’s usually only high-end professional panels whose prices hit four figures. Asus has plenty to prove here.

Related: 2016's Greatest Monitors

Asus ROG Swift PG348Q – Specs and Design

The 34in diagonal, 21:9 ultra-wide aspect ratio of the PG348Q will benefit most games. You get greater peripheral vision during racing games and twitchy first-person shooters, plus the extra screen real-estate means strategy games and MOBAs are more accommodating. In my opinion this is far more useful than buying a taller screen with a more conventional aspect ratio.

The curve helps, too. I’ve used huge 4K panels that have looked off-colour in the corners because those parts of the screen are just so far away. The PG348Q's curve is less pronounced than other such screens; you'd need a circle with a radius of 380cm to match the curve of this screen, making it fairly subtle. Still, it's enough to keep everything looking clear in the extreme corners.

The 3,440 x 1,440 resolution matches the PG348Q’s big rival – the 34in Samsung S34E790C. The high pixel count and broad screen mean the Asus delivers a pixel density of 110ppi. Asus ROG Swift PG348Q 1

This is an excellent figure. It's more dense than 1080p and 1440p panels, which means games are sharper and there’s greater room for work – but not so detailed that I needed to use the Windows 10 scaling options to make text and icons legible.

The 110ppi density isn’t quite as good as the majority of 4K panels, however. While this means that games won’t be quite as crisp, there are advantages. The 4.9 million pixels used in the Asus panel won’t be as demanding on GPUs as the 8.2 million rendered on 4K screens, so there will be less need for stratospheric graphics cards. With that said, if you're buying a monitor this expensive, you probably have a fairly high-end PC gaming setup at home that's well prepared for proper 4K gaming.

Although both the Asus and Samsung monitors are of the same size and resolution, the PG348Q is significantly pricier than the £700 Samsung screen. That’s because the Republic of Gamers panel is packed with a greater number of features.

For starters, there’s Nvidia G-Sync. This technology syncs the GPU’s frame rate with the refresh rate of the monitor to avoid stuttering and tearing, and it works flawlessly. The Asus can run at a maximum of 100Hz, which is ample; some screens offer 144Hz refresh rates, which will undoubtedly be smoother, but not by much.

In addition, the IPS panel is an impressive slab of technology. A true 10-bit screen, it is capable of rendering 1.07 billion colours. That’s a few more than the 16.7 million on offer from the Samsung’s 8-bit panel. Asus rates the screen as being able to display 100% of the sRGB colour gamut.

The PG348Q comes with a pair of 2W speakers – and they’re surprisingly good. They offer decent volume and punch, and a reasonable mid-range with a satisfying amount of detail. The lowest and highest sounds struggle a little because of a narrow range, but the audio kit included here is usable if no alternatives are available.

The Asus is one of the most outlandlish monitors I’ve seen. Its three wide legs and the broad, circular stand are finished in gunmetal grey, with burnt orange accents throughout, and the rear of the panel is finished in a futuristic pattern.

That isn't the only bit of ostentatious design. The base is covered in LEDs that project the Republic of Gamers logo downwards in a dramatic orange tone; it certainly stands out on a dark desk. Asus does include a button to alter the brightness of the light – and, thankfully, an option to turn it off. Expect to see quite a few of these over at /r/battlestations in the not-too-distant future.

The Asus design is in stark contrast to the Samsung, which is slim, finished in glossy plastic and brushed metal and comes with a smart, subtle stand.

Asus ROG Swift PG348Q – Setup

The PG348Q looks good, but its extravagant design results in the Asus being one of the largest screens I’ve ever tested.

Its 11.1kg weight makes it more than a kilo heavier than the Samsung, and the PG348Q’s chunky legs mean it stretches 297mm front front to back – more than the 276mm of the Samsung. The Asus screen is wider and taller than its rival, too.

As a result, it wasn’t too easy to put this screen together. The legs fit to the stand via a couple of screws, but the positioning was a little awkward, after which plastic panels then had to be attached. The stand then had to be clamped into the rear of the screen, and a second plastic panel is then fitted to cover up the ports and connectors.

At least the PG348Q offers good versatility once it's assembled. There’s 115mm of height adjustment and 25 degrees of tilt, and the panel can swivel from side to side. It also has 100mm VESA mount compatibility. With all this it excels over the Samsung, which offers a shorter range of height adjustment and no swivel option.

The on-screen display is decent, too, and is controlled by a joystick on the rear of the screen – the same method as the Samsung. The PG348Q’s menu is the fastest I’ve used, to the point of being a little too twitchy, at least at first. After a while, though, I was zipping around the menus with familiarity – helped, too, by their sensible layout.

Asus has loaded the PG348Q with DisplayPort 1.2 and HDMI 1.4 connections, plus four USB 3 ports, all of which are fine. Samsung’s screen only differs by including a second HDMI connection.

Related: The Best Gaming Keyboards

Accessing the PG348Q’s ports is a little tricky, however. They all face downwards, plus they're hidden behind a removable plastic shroud. It won't be a problem if hardware is plugged in and never removed, but it’s hardly conducive to quick switches.


April 15, 2016, 4:20 pm

No mention of the Acer Predator X34 which is the logical competitor to this device?

Kyle Jackson

April 16, 2016, 6:27 pm

Will/is there a Freesync option?


April 16, 2016, 9:06 pm

No, asus has standards

Kyle Jackson

April 16, 2016, 9:33 pm

Hey everybody, we found the fangirl. Tell me, what are you doing up past your bedtime little one, hmm?

PJ Gaudie

April 17, 2016, 6:11 pm

This review missed the mark. There's only one other monitor this can be compared to, and that's the Acer Predator X34. Comparing it to the Samsung S34E790C is pointless because that monitor doesn't have G-Sync or 100Hz. They're not even in the same ballpark.

Plagiarism Police

April 18, 2016, 9:53 am

What's the matter with you people, why don't you take action against Channel News which continues plagiarising the content on your site? It makes you look bad that you can't protect your own content. How can I trust a site that takes no action to ensure its content remains trusted? Sick to death of seeing plagiarists at Channel News win and you lose.


April 18, 2016, 2:12 pm

Those are the 2 I've been trying to choose between, the X34 Predator and the PG348Q. I'm leaning towards the 348Q currently as there have been no cases (that I can find) of the issues that plagued the x34 launch (coil whine, banding etc)

PJ Gaudie

April 18, 2016, 2:19 pm

I wouldn't say the PG348Q has been free of QA issues, but it might be a little better. However, it does have a massively superior OSD interface, and most prefer it's exterior aesthetics. It's just impossible to find right now.

Michael Passingham

April 18, 2016, 5:08 pm

Hi, could you please send me the offending URL - I couldn't find it. my.name @ trustedreviews.com


April 18, 2016, 6:15 pm

Coil Whine is my main worry. I'm sure it doesn't bother everyone but having had a few chargers in the past with it, I know it drives me nuts!
One problem I'm having with my 348q plan over the x34 is getting a suitable stand!
I want to get a VESA arm as I don't want to deal with it being so far forwards, but it is much heavier than the x34 and deeper, I spoke to support at ergotron and they don't have an arm strong enough :-/

PJ Gaudie

April 18, 2016, 6:39 pm

I believe it's 11.1kg with the stand, so a little less without, but regardless, these would work: http://www.ergotron.com/Pro...

PJ Gaudie

April 18, 2016, 6:54 pm

.... and someone told me it's only 7.5kg without the stand! (yes, that sounds like a heavy stand if that is accurate): http://www.overclock.net/t/...

Plagiarism Police

April 29, 2016, 4:27 pm

just go to channelnews . com . au and take a look. almost every day especially with an article talking about tech there is plagiarism taking place from your site. If you watch every day you'll see it.


May 16, 2016, 11:58 pm

Ordered one of these. I looked a lot at the X34 but this one swayed me. Hopefully lives up to expectations.


June 2, 2016, 10:15 pm

The speakers seem to be a after thought. and they are tinny and crap.. for any thing other than news videos or talk shows..


Tom Old

November 20, 2016, 10:28 pm

"I’d stick to more conventional settings on both panels." What does this mean? What settings would you recommend using on the PG348Q for general gaming use?

Rui Magro

January 2, 2017, 5:51 pm

have this monitor -- and the output color depth is always 8 bpc, not 10 bpc... don't think it's a true 10 bit monitor.


March 17, 2017, 5:22 pm

Year later and no Freesync option, I think Asus has standards after all.

Kyle Jackson

March 17, 2017, 5:31 pm

Meanwhile, Freesync has been implemented into a vast amount more monitors, than G Sync has, or ever will be.

I guess consumers have more sense after all.


March 17, 2017, 5:41 pm

There's no accounting for taste. People wore tie dye too.

Kyle Jackson

March 17, 2017, 5:43 pm

That they did. But unlike Freesync monitors, most people didn't buy them.

comments powered by Disqus