Home » Computing » Peripheral » Apple Airport Extreme 2013

Apple Airport Extreme 2013 review

Gordon Kelly



Our Score


User Score


  • Class leading design and build quality
  • Smooth Mac OS X & iOS setup
  • Strong 802.11n 5GHz performance


  • Poor 802.11ac & 802.11n 2.4GHz performance
  • 3x Gigabit Ethernet
  • Single USB 2.0 port
  • Limited WPS support

Review Price £169.00

Key Features: 802.11a/b/g/n/ac wireless; 3x Gigabit Ethernet; WPA/WPA2 encryption; USB 2.0 port; Integrated PSU

Manufacturer: Apple

What is the Apple AirPort Extreme (2013)?

As the brackets suggest, this is the 2013 edition of Apple's AirPort Extreme wireless router. The big news this time around is Apple has added the next generation 802.11ac wireless standard to bring it up to date with the latest flagship routers from the likes of Asus, D-Link, Linksys and Netgear. Given the previous AirPort Extreme was released over two years ago, Apple has also overhauled the design, which the company claims is "rebuilt for speed".

SEE ALSO: 802.11ac vs 802.11n: what's the difference?

2011 2013

Left, 2013 AirPort Express; right, 2013 AirPort Extreme

Apple AirPort Extreme (2013) - Design

So what does this spruce up entail? Gone is the formerly flat, traditional rectangular design of the 2011 edition to be replaced by what can only be described as a white, elongated Apple TV (see comparison above). The logic is the switch in form factor allows Apple to position the antennas at the top, creating a higher platform for signal dispersal. It also reduces the Extreme's desktop footprint by 64 per cent with the base measuring just 98 x 98mm compared to the 16.5 x 16.5mm of its predecessor.

This being Apple 'rebuilt for speed' isn't the only motivation, there is no doubt that 'rebuilt for style' was also a key consideration as the AirPort Extreme is by far the best looking router we have ever seen. This might seem glib for a product which is essentially a white, angular tube, but the result is a router that is both minimalist and eye-catching and the gentle curves are simple yet dramatic enough that we can imagine Jonathan Ive agonising with his protractor for weeks.

A nice touch is Apple has built in the power supply to keep cabling neat. In short, the company has rewritten the rule book for router design.

Construction is outstanding, too. Typically we forgive routers their somewhat hollow and cheap plastic construction because of the protests that this is needed to let signal pass through. Apple has scoffed at this and the new AirPort Extreme is solid, weighing in at a hefty 945g, and the casing is clearly cut in a single piece with beautifully drilled port and power slots.

If we were to quibble, Apple's choice of a matt finish for the top and gloss finish for the sides is a little inconsistent, but it isn't overly noticeable and both are highly resistant to fingerprints. It also seems laughable Apple has including just a single pinhole status light on the front, but many will stomach such wild impracticality for the superficial benefits it brings.

AirPort Extreme 2

Apple AirPort Extreme (2013) - Features

We've haven't talked so long about router design before so we'll crack on through the features and the first thing to notice is the theme of minimalism continues, but this time in an area it is not welcome.

Of course the headline act is the new Extreme's 802.11ac wireless and its backwards compatibility with 802.11a/b/g, but aside from this numerous corners are cut. Illustrating Apple's stubbornness over standards it dislikes, the Extreme is the only modern, premium router we've seen to omit WPS and even takes the effort of fudging the standard with pin codes to connect WPS-based printers.

Apple isn't overly keen on incorporating standards it does like either and, like the new Time Capsule range, the 2013 Extreme continues to ignore AirPlay missing out on a powerful differentiator. There are also just three Gigabit Ethernet ports rather than the usual four to accompany the WAN port and a single USB 2.0 port, for sharing a hard drive or printer across the network, when a minimum of two or at least one USB 3.0 port tends to be the bare minimum for high-end routers these days.

One the plus side, the Extreme can operate both as a router and wireless bridge (at which point the WAN port can be used as a fourth Gigabit LAN), there's IPv6 support (which works over PPOE for the first time) and WPA and WPA2 encryption standards aboard. But it isn't enough.

Next page


September 5, 2013, 9:30 am

I know design is a subjective thing, and most routers are still a bit 2000's in their appearance, but I don't get excited by this at all. Sounds like an expensive pile of crap to me. Glad I read the review first!

Any idea if you'll be reviewing the 2013 express?

Gordon Kelly

September 8, 2013, 2:55 pm

If the appearance doesn't grab you then you're lucky - it is what will sell them and sadly the substance behind it is lacking.

And yes that's on the list :)


September 9, 2013, 7:05 am

It is a shame this router performs so badly. I have no interest in the Airport Extreme, but I imagine the router performance of the 2013 Time Capsule will be more or less identical, and as Time Machine refuses to place nicely with any other network drive, the Time Capsule has a very compelling USP for Mac users who want the convenience and peace of mind of continuous backup. If I had a desktop Mac, I'd happily connect an external Thunderbolt drive for backup and leave it connected, but the sad truth is that for a laptop the rigmarole of connecting a USB/Thunderbolt drive means mine at least (and I'm sure I'm far from alone!) doesn't get backed up nearly as often as it should. I was planning to pick up a 2013 Time Capsule and upgrading my wifi to 802.11ac at one fell swoop, with the intention of snapping up Apple's next iteration of the MacBook Pro Retina (which will surely include 802.11ac, as does the recent refresh of the MacBook Air), but may now need to rethink. Maybe the good money is on finding an old Time Capsule for a reduced price and getting a better 802.11ac router elsewhere.


September 26, 2013, 1:39 am

I wonder a bit about these results as I am an IT guy with over 20 years of experience. In my home tests the router maintained a signal at superior distance and throughput to the ASUS or a Netgear 6300v2 AC router. Maybe they got a bad unit or maybe production line improvements have been made.


September 30, 2013, 6:24 pm

You might want to check the dimensions of the predecessor - I doubt it was 16.5mm x 16.5mm and it it was it's hardly a reduction from 98mm x 98mm! ;)

Kordon Gelly

December 16, 2013, 5:13 pm

With a line like "High on style, light on substance and disinterested in other platforms continues the Apple stereotype..." you cannot possibly claim to be unbiased and this cannot possibly in TrustedReview's best interest to publish this.

How come SmallNetBuilder's review (which in my opinion is more trustable than TrustedReviews) shows better results?


December 17, 2013, 12:30 pm

Testing conditions add a fair amount of variability to all router testing. That's just the nature of the beast and I don't agree that stating something fairly obvious makes us biased. The results we obtained back up the statement, though that doesn't make it a bad product by any means, which is why it score a 7/10.

Kordon Gelly

December 17, 2013, 1:32 pm

Kelly Scored it 6/10... not 7/10.


December 17, 2013, 1:35 pm

Apologies, memory failing me.


December 24, 2013, 11:39 am

just gigabit ports, not gigabit capability! I have gigabit internet connection,on pppoe imac spees reach 790-940 mbits, on airport wired connection less than 300 (230mbits)!!!


February 21, 2014, 6:02 pm

Similarly, I'm wondering if firmware updates since this test were done have improved it. We have an Airport Extreme at the office for a few wireless devices that we want off of the main network, and it's been flawless. d

Bob Moose

August 20, 2014, 12:53 pm

I do not like this product at all. Very expensive and very slow. Apple seems to focus on looks and not functionality. In my opinion, a very poor product, indeed. It's refreshing that someone speaks the truth as this review has done.

comments powered by Disqus