Home / Computing / Software / Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 2.0

Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 2.0 review




  • Editors choice
Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 2.0


Our Score:


So finally, after months of public beta testing the new version of Lightroom is here. As good as the original was, Adobe has found a way to add more features and integrate it with features from Photoshop CS3 and presumably the forthcoming Photoshop CS4.

We first looked at the package in the beta review, which still had some bugs and didn't have full integration with existing libraries from version 1.0, amongst other tools.

The final release isn't too far removed from that of the beta, but it seems stable and now offers backwards compatibility with images and libraries from the previous release. This doesn't just mean that it will open older libraries and offer the full benefit of the new features, it also transfers any presets you may have saved or downloaded, including web galleries, image effects and so on.

The library module of version 2.0 has been updated to provide better searching tools, including searching by keywords, filters and camera and image metadata. This is ideal for photographic journalists, but also useful for photographers wishing to compare bracketed shots, for example, or other parameters.

There's now options to make Smart Collections, similar to Smart Playlists in iTunes. For example, all images that you have selected with five stars, or all images with the keyword 'Christmas' could be found in a Smart Collection with those criteria set. Keywording has also been enhanced, with Lightroom offering suggestions based on existing labels of similar images taken at around the same time.

Dark of Day

August 14, 2008, 11:41 pm

I'm dying to try this, sounds like it includes all the improvements I was looking for :)


August 15, 2008, 2:32 pm

I had a copy of the previous version of Lightroom, and to be honest I found it was a bit of a "third wheel" on my machine. I just tended to copy my pictures into a folder and use the thumbnail view to sort through them.

The only use I had for Lr was for .RAW files that Vista dosn't read. All post processing etc was done in Photoshop. Having said that I'm not a professional photographer...

comments powered by Disqus