Review Price free/subscription
There's a Picture In Picture, which you can assign to each of the inputs and you can have the sound coming from the small picture or from the larger - so you could have the football in the background and have it with or without sound. There's also a Picture and Picture function - each one side by side. A sleep timer is available and easy to set up via the remote.
After the poor performance of the in-built tuner I decided to feed it some better signals. I hooked it up to Blu-ray drive equipped Windows Media Center PC via HDMI. I soon discovered that the 1,366 x 768 resolution is a difficult one for a PC graphics card to deal with as no graphics driver will directly support it. The closest resolution you can get is 1,360 x 768, and in fact this is what is listed in the specs for the manual. The result is that when viewing on a PC the Windows desktop doesn't extend all the way to the edges, so you get a box within a frame effect.
As well as the HDMI connection, I also hooked up via VGA and obtained a noticeably softer picture. However, that's not to say that the Windows desktop over HDMI was great. Despite being hooked up via a digital connection, text was readable but letters seemed quite blurry, with some letter thicker than others and seeming to almost bleed into once another. This is not a display I could recommend for office work for any length of time.
There are four different image modes available when connected by HDMI. These are Standard, which is quite bright - backing up the 500 cd/m² claim, Mild, which dials things down a little, Vivid, that dials them right up again and a User Preset mode, which lets you try and optimise things for yourself, though I could only make things even worse. However long I played with the settings I couldn't really obtain a picture I was happy with.
Our demanding DisplayMate test revealed the cause of the poor text - quite severe pixel tracking errors. Continuing with the DisplayMate tests, I found that there was also severe banding issues in the 256 Colour Ramp test, and the Colour Purity test displayed colours that were anything but - dark on the right hand side on lighter on the left. In the colour scaling test the blocks faded away so quickly the darker boxes could barely be seen. Viewsonic's claim of a contrast ratio of 1000:1 seem to me to be grossly exaggerated.
This directly manifested itself in the video performance. The Blu-ray Vin Diesel movie XXX provided the best feed possible for this TV. Even despite the small size the extra lines of resolution over standard def could be made out but there was precious little in the way of shadow detail. I could improve things by brightening up the image in the software player's own settings but this mads the overall picture looked washed out.
I tried DivX HD, WMV HD and H.264 encoded HD Quicktime clips and nothing really shone. Colours never seemed quite right with skin tones having too much red.
On the upside, the viewing angle was actually quite respectable, thanks to the use of Super MVA technology in the panel. I had no reason to doubt the 8ms response time claims either with smooth lag free images. Another up side was the sound quality - being quite loud and with decent mid-range. Certainly good enough to fill a small room.
In the end the only images I was happy watching on the n2060w was standard def pictures piped via the Media Center's digital TV Tuner and only because I have low expectations of Freeview quality.
The Viewsonic n2060w's feature list is promising but ultimately it doesn't meet the grade as an all round TV and PC monitor. The design is disappointing, particularly of the remote. Despite its HD resolution and wealth of connectivity, the n2060w doesn't justify its £399 asking price.
Update: Following this review Viewsonic supplied a replacement monitor. The picture was slightly better with more vivid colours and slightly more detail in darker areas. The display is now available for £299.
Scores In Detail
- Image Quality