Home » TVs & Audio » TV » Sony Bravia KDL-22E5300 22in LCD TV » Sony Bravia KDL-22E5300

Sony Bravia KDL-22E5300 22in LCD TV - Sony Bravia KDL-22E5300

John Archer

By John Archer
Reviewed:

Awards

  • Recommended by TR
Sony Bravia KDL-22E5300 22in LCD TV

Summary

Our Score

9/10

User Score

Review Price free/subscription

As we would expect given the 22E5300's design and level of functionality, it's fully equipped with Sony's neat Picture Frame functionality, which reduces the TV's power consumption and allows you to use the screen - at reduced power - as a virtual photo or painting frame when you're not actually watching TV on it.

A more startling and hugely welcome string to the 22E5300's bow is its Bravia Engine 3 (BE3) picture processing. BE3 is the very latest generation of Sony's dependable Bravia Engine system, and is the same system sported, to excellent effect, by Sony's latest big-screen W5500 and V5500 TVs.

More good news finds the 22E5300 claiming a contrast ratio of 80,000:1, which is simply vast by the standards of the small-screen market, while its native resolution is an HD Ready 1,366 x 768. We guess this might seem slightly disappointing given that we've recently seen a £400 22in TV from LG, the 22LU5000, that delivers a Full HD resolution. But visible differences between a very good HD Ready 22in TV and a decent Full HD 22in TV are likely to be minimal at most.

Even the 22E5300's audio promises to be in a different world to the relentlessly puny efforts of many sub-26in TVs (including LG's 22LU5000), thanks to a claimed 2 x 10W of power.

In starting to assess the 22E5300's pictures, I might as well say right from the off that it produces the finest pictures I've ever seen from such a small TV. By a country mile. For a start, they're extremely dynamic and punchy, sidestepping the tendency towards dullness common with small screens, yet also delivering brightness without compromising contrast.

In fact, the set's contrast is a revelation, thanks largely to black levels that look richer, deeper and just more natural than those of any other small TV to date. The night sky as Clint's neighbour tries to steal his Gran Torino car in, well, Gran Torino, suffers scarcely any trace of the greyness or blueness that would spoil the scene to some extent on any other small screen. There's not even any obvious sign of the minor backlight inconsistencies noted with some of Sony's current big-screen models.

As I've pointed out many times before, good black levels are usually accompanied by good colours, and the E5300 doesn't let me down. For its palette is expansive, full of subtlety when it comes to blends and tonal shifts, and finally and most winningly, remarkably natural in tone - even when showing notoriously tough sequences like the one in the rebel army hut in Uganda near the start of Casino Royale.

Previous page
Next page

Peter

August 4, 2009, 5:24 am

Looks good! Any reason why 1366 x 768 is not available as a PC resolution? Is there a way of getting native resolution with a PC?

Goodmane

August 4, 2009, 2:11 pm

Great review, nice looking TV. But is it available in black?





Surely Sony would have caught more of an already niche market with a TV that looks like a TV rather than a picture frame, I know it's a stumbling block for me as think it would look outdated in 6 months!

Andy0d2

August 4, 2009, 4:35 pm

Is there any reason why '720p' sets have the resolution 1366x768 whereas 720p is actually 1280x720 and therefore unless you view the 720p content in a box it is not natively displayed and therefore has scaling, which usually means a poorer quality picture (atleast over that small scaling as 1 pixel is about 1.1 - 1.2 pixels rather than say 2 in which case scaling works better). On the other hand 1080p sets can display it natively as 1080p sets have 1080x1920 and that is the same resolution as the content. So to summarise why does 720p TV's (actually 768p) not have the same resolution as the content it was designed for yet 1080p TV's do. I think I may be missing something here but to get an answer would be nice as this is a question that has had me stumped for a while.

hankb6d

August 5, 2009, 4:00 am

Looks truly awful and the PC resolutions and HDMI can be easily beaten along with price on a two year old Samsung.

john salkeld

August 10, 2009, 10:13 pm

im afraid i bought one of these and must say the picture is absolutly awful the worst lcd i have seen


it good for the rest of the gear on it but that is it for me

comments powered by Disqus