Comments on Sharp Aquos LC-46DH77E 46in LCD TV

Name withheld

Techno22

10:52 AM on 20 March, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Techno22. Show DetailsHide Details

Personally I think that you are not harsh enough!


To my mind, it is time that we stopped making excuses for flawed technology.


It is my belief that motion blur is unacceptable. Full stop.


Years ago, when technology was not so advanced, a TV would have been rejected for such a major flaw - given 0 out of 10.


And rightly so!


Also, over the years, the standard of sound reproduction seems to have dropped for some reason.


It is often flawed, as with the current model under review.


It is rare indeed to find a set getting top marks in both picture and sound.


Often one of these aspects is found wanting, more often the sound.


Finally, I have to say that, in general, I find the reviews on this site to be of a very high standard.


They are among the best around.


They are very much in depth reviews, which consumers need.


They might be a little bit generous on the markings at times, but that is just my view.


I honestly don't believe that a TV suffering motion blur should get an overall 8 or 9 out of ten - or anything like it.


Well done, in the present review, on making the point about the amount of paper needed to produce the instruction manual.


Sometimes you have to wonder how sincere manufacturer's are about their commitment to the environment.


Keep up the good work.


I always enjoy reading the reviews, and I appreciate the amount of work and research that goes into them.