Samsung SyncMaster 226cw - SyncMaster 226cw

Ardjuna Seghers

By Ardjuna Seghers

Reviewed:

Summary

Our Score:

7

User Score:

Unfortunately, adjustability seems to once again have been left by the wayside. There is absolutely no swivel, height adjustments or pivot, and only the barest tilt, which is not even easy to operate. This would be disappointing on any monitor, but especially on one that might potentially have appealed to hobbyist/amateur graphics and photo enthusiasts. Also, attempting to tilt the monitor brings to light another slight issue, which is that build quality is not as solid as even most other SyncMasters, with some noticeable creaking.

Moving onto the OSD, it's the typical Samsung affair with clear icons but drab colours. This is one area where I wish more manufacturers would emulate Dell, with its colourful menus as seen on the recently reviewed UltraSharp 2408WFP. In terms of usability, the 226cw's menus are average: not particularly intuitive but never confusing. The buttons are really easy to use because, though they are not visible, their labels are clearly marked in the silver section beside the power button. Another touch I personally appreciate is that the 226cw is one of those relatively rare monitors that actually remembers its previous menu location when you re-enter the OSD.

There is a dedicated source-selection button to switch between the two inputs (HDCP-enabled DVI and analogue VGA), one for brightness and a MagicBright button for various presets (Custom, Text, Internet, Game, Sport, Movie, Dynamic Contrast). Why dynamic contrast justifies its own mode separate from Game, Movie and Sport is anyone's guess, since those are really the only scenarios where you are likely to want it, but the other modes are sensible and appear to be well-configured. Also, as on any wide colour gamut monitor worth is salt, it's possible to turn overdrive (in this case called Response Time Acceleration) off.

Samsung does include a feature that's supposed to make its OSD redundant -to the extent that all adjustments can be made under Windows through software called MagicTune. MagicTune is a Samsung-exclusive application that helps you to optimally set-up and fine-tune your SyncMaster monitor. However, we couldn't get the version on the included CD to run on two different Vista machines, while a newer download caused incompatibility warnings.

Starting image quality off on some positives, the SyncMaster 226cw features a very even backlight distribution. There is nary a hint of backlight bleed, except towards the bottom centre of the screen. It also made short work of our DisplayMate tests, differentiating well between subtle colour gradients, and managing to distinguish between the brightest whites and darkest blacks simultaneously - a test many TNs fail.

This is the main area where the 226cw would justify its price, were it not for some significant downsides. Surprisingly, considering the otherwise excellent tonal performance, there is some noticeable banding across darker shades. More damningly, this SyncMaster suffers from quite poor horizontal viewing angles, with obvious colour shift - especially a pink haze that comes to dominate whites - when moving off-centre. The upside is that as long as you are in the sweet-spot, this is not an issue.

Ron Royce

June 19, 2008, 3:02 am

I read this review after sending two of these back and I can't believe we saw the same product.





OK, first the good points...colours were vivid, very fast panel response and it does look very good on the desktop. It functions well although the out-of-the-box settings were, to be frank, awful.





Now the bad. Both my samples had horrendous light leakage and my test game, Doom 3 (old but great for showing up black level problems!) was ruined by a red 'sunset glow' at the bottom of the display. I also found the viewing angles to be very poor, especially in the vertical plane. Backlighting was very uneven and the panel suffered with quite excessive mura. I found the perimeter backlight method to be a major distraction as well, which I felt was a major contributor to the poor black levels I experienced on both samples. Using powerpoint I displayed a background of 20% white and the lack of uniformity from bottom to top of the display was staggering. I can't believe a company like Samsung would allow this past QC.





From the samples that I had I am suspecting we have another 226BW instalment here? Your thoughts would be appreciated.





I decided to spend a lot more money in the end after looking at several 22" monitors and being thoroughly underwhelmed by what was on offer, and now have a LaCie 324, which I am very pleased with. Fabulous colour, excellent, uniform black level, viewing angles are very good with moderate colour shift off angle but nothing like as bad as a TN. More importantly it passed the Doom 3 test :) This shows that you do indeed get what you pay for. It is a worthy replacement for my old IIyama Vision Master Pro 454, which finally gave up the ghost this week but was a stunning CRT monitor... RIP

TechVegan

July 1, 2008, 4:33 pm

I wouldn't be suprised if this was "another 226BW instalment", since in terms of backlight bleed especially our experiences seem to have been very different. The viewing angles were poor on my model too though. If one wants a decent-quality monitor, one's best bet right now is still a non-TN 24in, like the LaCie you have - nice choice, btw :)

comments powered by Disqus