Comments Nikon D5000 Digital SLR - Digital Camera - review

Comments

Please wait while we process your request

Please wait while we retrieve the user's information

Bio

Your bio is currently empty. Now is a great time to fill in your profile.

This profile is private.

This profile is only shared with friends.

This profile is under review.

We were unable to request friendship with this user.

We were unable to request friendship with this user. Are you logged in?

Your friendship request has been sent to this user.

We were unable to terminate friendship with this user.

We were unable to terminate friendship with this user. Are you logged in?

You are no longer friends with this user.

We were unable to ignore this user.

We were unable to ignore this user. Are you logged in?

This user is now ignored.

We were unable to stop ignoring this user.

We were unable to stop ignoring this user. Are you logged in?

This user is no longer ignored.

pluck_user_mp-abuse_too_long_err

Name withheld

Noodles

9:10 PM on 11 September, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Noodles. Show Details Hide Details

Blimey, this camera must have hit every branch of every tree in the ugly orchard.. It has got to be the ugliest digital SLR ever made, and that includes the infamous Olympus E-300.

And to think, Nikon used to get Giugiaro Design to design it's film cameras..

Score:

Name withheld

leonid82

10:45 PM on 11 September, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore leonid82. Show Details Hide Details

Hi Cliff,

I wonder howcome your D5000 review blasts the ISO Performance, while every other review site is praising High ISO Performance for this camera. This was the case with even Nikon D90. Going by the results of your review, Nikon cameras underperform in your hands!! Any reasons...

Score:

Name withheld

CliffSmith

1:40 PM on 12 September, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore CliffSmith. Show Details Hide Details

I'm sure I have no idea why some sites would be talking up a camera that Nikon is sure to be advertising heavily in the run up to Christmas...

I try to take all my ISO test shots under consistent lighting conditions, lit by a north-facing window and a Lastolite reflector, but it seems to be true that the exposure meter used in the D90 and D5000 doesn't like my tabletop studio set-up; I have no idea why. I tried it on all metering options with similar results.

Score:

Name withheld

AndyfromVA

10:03 PM on 12 September, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore AndyfromVA. Show Details Hide Details

I'm looking forward to your review of the Canon EOS 500D. It's very similar to the Nikon D5000 and in direct competition with it. Is it significantly better than the D5000? Significantly worse? So far the professional reviews I've read judge it a stand off.

Score:

Name withheld

Gingerscot

12:38 PM on 13 September, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Gingerscot. Show Details Hide Details

I'm no expert but doesn't noise "expose" itself more when the image is underexposed like in these shots? If you correct the poor auto-metering would these image ISO problems be reduced? If it was the same shutter speed as another SLR at the samee ISO setting then that would be a more accurate test...I think.

Score:

Name withheld

miha

1:11 PM on 14 September, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore miha. Show Details Hide Details

I agree with Gingerscot. Each cam has its own quirks and when you use it for any prolonged time only then you can appreciate its capabilities. This cam seems to give preference to faster shutter speeds and in turn produces under-exposed images when used in full auto-metering mode. I could be wrong tho, this is my observation based on this review and no hands-on time with this particular cam. Could be it's just all down to not using latest firmware? Anyway, problems like this is something that anyone using it for longer than just taking few test shots could easily compensate for with setting it to one's needs and conditions. There's setting for this in any and all D-SLRs I know of. It would hardly matter much to me personally. If anything, I'd prefer it default to faster shutter speeds in most circumstances that I wouldn't have time to change cam's settings. Slight (1 step, by what I make of test shots) under-exposure in full auto mode in a cam with such dynamic range is hardly something worth taking much notice or giving it lesser score for IQ. Nice kit lens BTW :)

Score:

Name withheld

Luan Bach

6:39 PM on 14 September, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Luan Bach. Show Details Hide Details

Nikon DSLR auto modes has always the tendency to under-expose, compares to Canon, to maintain highlights. If you want straight out of the camera images then you'll need to add 1/3 or 1/2 stop compensation.

Score:

Name withheld

bert

4:03 PM on 18 September, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore bert. Show Details Hide Details

I tried my friend's D5000, it wasn't too bad. I didnt have my old D80 along side it but I felt it was either as good OR better than it in terms of Noise Control. Only thing I felt was the AF speed of the camera compared to my old D80, it was slower.

Score:

Name withheld

MK

7:21 PM on 19 October, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore MK. Show Details Hide Details

Thanks for this review. Enjoyed the perspective. Haven't tried the D5000 yet, and am already a big fan of the D90-this review makes me think it might be a nice travel camera. Also just read Peter Burian's mostly positive field test of the D5000 on Photocrati--he seemed to like it--though not as much as the D90, I think :)

Score:

Name withheld

MK

7:22 PM on 19 October, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore MK. Show Details Hide Details

One minor technical thing-- is there any way that you can make your reviews more scrollable so your fans don't have to keep clicking (and reloading) every page? Maybe I'm the only one who finds that a little annoying...

Score:

Name withheld

Digitaldesires

5:16 AM on 12 April, 2010

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Digitaldesires. Show Details Hide Details

Looking very charmy, but am allready use nikon D3000.

http://www.digitaldesires.net/nikon-d3000-with-18mm-55mm-lens-an-entry-level-dslr.html

Score:

Name withheld

M A K

3:20 PM on 4 September, 2010

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore M A K. Show Details Hide Details

Hi, can this camera support class 10 SDHC ? or SDXC

Score:

Please wait while we file your abuse report.

We're sorry. We were unable to report abuse at this time.

We limit the number of reactions an individual user can submit over a given period for quality reasons. You have currently reached that limit. Please try resubmitting your abuse report again later.

Comment is too long. Enter 500 characters or less.

Type Comment
(optional)

Please wait while we send the email.

You may send this to 5 e-mail addresses. Please separate each address with a space.

We're sorry, but the item you are sending has been removed from the site.

We're sorry. We were unable to send the email at this time.

Please specify a recipient.

You can only send messages to 5 addresses at a time.

The address "" is not valid.

Subject

Please specify a subject.

Comment
(optional) Send Cancel

Score
vote upvotes up
vote downvotes down

More Photos

The Nikon D5000 is a well made and well equipped mid-level camera ideal for those upgrading from an entry-level DSLR and looking for more features. Performance and handling are excellent, autofocus is quick and reliable, and image quality is very good under most circumstances. Video mode has no AF and the monitor opens the wrong way, but other than that it's a good little camera.