TrustedReviews

Home
TVs & Entertainment
Cameras
Laptops & Computing
Mobile & GPS
Video Reviews

Home » Cameras » Digital Camera » Nikon D3x Digital SLR » Compare prices

Compare Prices for Nikon D3x Digital SLR

More Photos
Video

It pretty much goes without saying that the Nikon D3x is an incredibly good camera, with the kind of performance, rugged reliability, versatility and most importantly image quality demanded by the top professionals. It is big, heavy and quite breathtakingly expensive, but if you're the sort of photographer who needs to have the very best then ask the picture agency you work for to buy you one. Read full review

Overall

10/10

Write your own review

By Cliff Smith
Reviewed 15 August 2009
Updated 26 May 2011

Price as reviewed

£4,800.00

	$8000	Buy now
	$8000	Buy now

compare more prices

Review
Video Review
User Reviews
Comments
Specs
28 Photos
Compare Prices

Price comparison powered by

Prices, delivery and availability at 2 retailers
	$8000	Go
	$8000	Go

Awards

Nikon D3x Digital SLR details

Value: 8/10
Image Quality: 10/10
Build Quality: 10/10
Overall: 10/10

Price as reviewed

£4,800.00

Manufacturer

Nikon

Digital Camera round-ups

Best Digital Cameras

A comprehensive list of the 10 best digital cameras currently on the market, with direct links to our reviews.
Best Waterproof Cameras

A round up of the best waterproof, shockproof, and generally all-round bombproof 'tough' compact digital cameras currently available.
Digital Camera Of The Year 2011

We reveal the winner of Best Digital Camera of 2011.

More Digital Camera Round-ups

TrustedReviews newsletter

Get TrustedReviews' award-winning reviews, opinions and advice delivered to your inbox for free!

Three of the best High end Digital Cameras

Fujifilm X-Pro1

Our rating:

10/10

Could this be the best compact system camera on the market?
Olympus OM-D E-M5

Our rating:

9/10

Olympus has gone all retro with its latest compact system camera, and boy does it impress.
Canon EOS 5D Mark III

Our rating:

9/10

Why the Mark III is the best 5D model yet...

User reviews & comments

Comments

To leave a comment log in or sign up

Please wait while we process your request

Please wait while we retrieve the user's information

Bio

Your bio is currently empty. Now is a great time to fill in your profile.

This profile is private.

This profile is only shared with friends.

This profile is under review.

We were unable to request friendship with this user.

We were unable to request friendship with this user. Are you logged in?

Your friendship request has been sent to this user.

We were unable to terminate friendship with this user.

We were unable to terminate friendship with this user. Are you logged in?

You are no longer friends with this user.

We were unable to ignore this user.

We were unable to ignore this user. Are you logged in?

This user is now ignored.

We were unable to stop ignoring this user.

We were unable to stop ignoring this user. Are you logged in?

This user is no longer ignored.

We encountered a problem recommending this user.

pluck_user_recommend_permission

You have recommended this user.

Type Comment
(optional)

pluck_user_mp-abuse_too_long_err

Send Cancel

Please wait while we perform your request.

Name withheld

Noodles

11:32 PM on 15 August, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Noodles. Show Details Hide Details

I went to a photography degree show a few months back, and the pictures drawing the largest crowd and praise were shot using an "inferior" four thirds Olympus E-420, and the worst, a series of badly shot, cliqued still lifes was shot using.. You guessed it, a D3X..

Had a good chuckle to myself when I left in the way only camera nerds can..

Abuse reported Report abuse

Score:

0 replies1 reply

Please wait while we perform your request.

Name withheld

Lee Marshall

12:41 AM on 16 August, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Lee Marshall. Show Details Hide Details

Having been fortunate to either own or use most high end DSLR's one question I get asked most often is "is it really worth the money?" The answer is most certainly YES! When I upgraded from a 30D to a 1D MKIIn a few years ago I couldn't believe the difference in image quality, bearing in mind they are the same resolution. I thought things may have changed over recent times until I tried a friends new 50D. The 50D was so incredibly noisy at 200 ISO ultimate IQ was not really any better than my old 30D. My advice is: if you are going to spend a chunk of money on a mid-range SLR, buy a two or three year old pro body instead. Something like a D2X, 1D MKII or a 5D. You won't regret it and it will be worth more at resale time.

Abuse reported Report abuse

Score:

0 replies1 reply

Please wait while we perform your request.

Name withheld

Tony Walker

4:22 AM on 16 August, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Tony Walker. Show Details Hide Details

...and don't forget to budget for good lenses too

Abuse reported Report abuse

Score:

0 replies1 reply

Please wait while we perform your request.

Name withheld

Dark of Day

4:28 AM on 16 August, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Dark of Day. Show Details Hide Details

Love the "defocused temporal perception" reference

Abuse reported Report abuse

Score:

0 replies1 reply

Please wait while we perform your request.

Name withheld

darkspark88

1:42 PM on 16 August, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore darkspark88. Show Details Hide Details

It's very true about the class structure with cameras. When I'm walking around Central London, there a loads of SLR users. You can see people drooling over cameras like sports cars.

Abuse reported Report abuse

Score:

0 replies1 reply

Please wait while we perform your request.

Name withheld

Ohmz

1:59 PM on 16 August, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Ohmz. Show Details Hide Details

"I swear I heard a small, strangled yelp from the 40D owner as his previous status was reversed in an instant, because he knew, and he knew that I knew, that in the world of DSLR cameras the D3x is Top Dog, the alpha male of the social order, and I couldn't have injured his pride any more painfully if I'd peed in his camera bag."

Okay...This review is getting weird...

Abuse reported Report abuse

Score:

0 replies1 reply

Please wait while we perform your request.

Name withheld

Digital Fury

2:12 PM on 16 August, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Digital Fury. Show Details Hide Details

Nice body but way too expensive. The D3 is much cheaper and just as good, unless you have to print billboard-size blowouts of your pictures. I'm a Canon user myself, and I got both a 5D MKII (FF + quality) and a 1D MKIII (1.3x + 10FPS) for less than the price of the D3X; lenses for these beasts cost a lot of money.

Abuse reported Report abuse

Score:

0 replies1 reply

Please wait while we perform your request.

Name withheld

Jim7

5:32 PM on 16 August, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Jim7. Show Details Hide Details

Unless you are a professional who knows exactly why you need such a beast, save your money and buy a D700 and a quality lens or two. The results will look exactly the same but you won't look like such a tw*t with it hanging round your neck.

Abuse reported Report abuse

Score:

0 replies1 reply

Please wait while we perform your request.

Name withheld

Martin Daler

9:01 PM on 16 August, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Martin Daler. Show Details Hide Details

@Digital Fury

of course as well as billboard size enlargements, you could also crop your photos more aggressively whilst remaining within an acceptable output resolution. If sensor technology develops far enough, all we would need would be one very high resolution wideangle prime lens - the zooming could all be done by cropping.

Not that I can afford a D3x...

Abuse reported Report abuse

Score:

0 replies1 reply

Please wait while we perform your request.

Name withheld

smc8788

9:56 PM on 16 August, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore smc8788. Show Details Hide Details

@ Martin Daler - To an extent yes, but in reality it would be both highly impractical and time consuming, especially for professionals. You also seem to be forgetting the effect focal length has on visual perspective; do a YouTube search for "dolly zoom" to see this same effect used in film, although it applies to still photography as well and is a useful compositional tool, especially where portraits are concerned.

Abuse reported Report abuse

Score:

0 replies1 reply

Please wait while we perform your request.

What Do You Think?

To leave a comment, you need to sign up.

Please wait while we file your abuse report.

Report Abuse

We're sorry. We were unable to report abuse at this time.

We limit the number of reactions an individual user can submit over a given period for quality reasons. You have currently reached that limit. Please try resubmitting your abuse report again later.

Comment is too long. Enter 500 characters or less.