Comments Kodak EasyShare Z1012 IS - Digital Camera - review

Comments

Please wait while we process your request

Please wait while we retrieve the user's information

Bio

Your bio is currently empty. Now is a great time to fill in your profile.

This profile is private.

This profile is only shared with friends.

This profile is under review.

We were unable to request friendship with this user.

We were unable to request friendship with this user. Are you logged in?

Your friendship request has been sent to this user.

We were unable to terminate friendship with this user.

We were unable to terminate friendship with this user. Are you logged in?

You are no longer friends with this user.

We were unable to ignore this user.

We were unable to ignore this user. Are you logged in?

This user is now ignored.

We were unable to stop ignoring this user.

We were unable to stop ignoring this user. Are you logged in?

This user is no longer ignored.

pluck_user_mp-abuse_too_long_err

Name withheld

AndyVandervell

2:46 PM on 29 August, 2008

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore AndyVandervell. Show Details Hide Details

S8000fd available for under £150. Enough said really.

Score:

Name withheld

SpiderJacek

10:15 PM on 29 August, 2008

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore SpiderJacek. Show Details Hide Details

Cliff, you wrote: "This means it can also use a non-rechargeable CRV3, or two AA batteries, which could come in handy if you forget to take your battery charger on holiday."

It is partially true, as all Kodak cameras that accept AA cells work ONLY on lithium batteries. They CANNOT be powered by AA alkaline batteries or Ni-MH rechargeables You can either use expensive lithium CRV3 batteries; KODAK Li-Ion Rechargeable KLIC-8000 (you will have to buy a charger for it) or AA lithium batteries, which are more expensive than alkalines. That is very limiting.

Or you can make yourself a battery if you are into DIY:

http://www.dcresource.com/forums/showpost.php?p=280566&postcount=2

Score:

Name withheld

tameside

5:40 PM on 15 September, 2008

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore tameside. Show Details Hide Details

Somebody is blind and I'm sure it aint me! Looking at the recent 10star review of the Pana FZ28 I see washed out colours, dull green on the sports car and iffy red on the jag! Looking at the cathedral pic I see no colur whatsoever in stained glass windows, the kodak however has atleast pulled some colour from somewhere, overall the Kodak seems a million miles ahead of the Pana, including noise/colour/lightness etc, go look again, I dont own either!

Score:

Name withheld

burnie

2:34 AM on 29 August, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore burnie. Show Details Hide Details

S_p_i_d_e_r , hate to disagree , But I`ve had 2 different Kodak Z`s , and plain ol` AA`s , Alkaline and Nimh will all work . They just don`t last as long as Kodaks expensive Klic 8000 rechargeable Lithiums . The CRV 3 Lithium (non-rechargeable) only costs about $10.00...and lasts longer than any other I`ve tried . Saying nothing will work but the Lithium seems to be Kodaks way of self promoting their battery line .

Score:

Please wait while we file your abuse report.

We're sorry. We were unable to report abuse at this time.

We limit the number of reactions an individual user can submit over a given period for quality reasons. You have currently reached that limit. Please try resubmitting your abuse report again later.

Comment is too long. Enter 500 characters or less.

Type Comment
(optional)

Please wait while we send the email.

You may send this to 5 e-mail addresses. Please separate each address with a space.

We're sorry, but the item you are sending has been removed from the site.

We're sorry. We were unable to send the email at this time.

Please specify a recipient.

You can only send messages to 5 addresses at a time.

The address "" is not valid.

Subject

Please specify a subject.

Comment
(optional) Send Cancel

Score
vote upvotes up
vote downvotes down

More Photos

Although only a year old, the Kodak EasyShare Z1012 IS has not aged well, and looks very weak by comparison to rival models, especially more recent ones. One can forgive the utilitarian design and slightly limited range of features, but the extremely slow performance and shoddy image quality are damning faults. It is also quite expensive for its specification. There are much better cameras for not much more money.

Overall

6/10

Write your own review

Reviewed by Cliff Smith

29 August 2008

Price as reviewed

£175.00

Comments on Kodak EasyShare Z1012 IS

Overall

Price as reviewed

Comments

Name withheld

AndyVandervell

Name withheld

SpiderJacek

Name withheld

tameside

Name withheld

burnie

Awards

Scores in detail

Price as reviewed

Manufacturer

Three of the best Mid range Digital Cameras

Canon PowerShot SX130 IS

Casio Exilim EX-FH100

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX5

Explore TrustedReviews

Site Sections

Round-ups

Tools and Social

More Information

Comments on Kodak EasyShare Z1012 IS

Overall

Price as reviewed

Comments

Comments

Name withheld

Name withheld

Name withheld

Name withheld

Awards

Scores in detail

Price as reviewed

Manufacturer

Digital Camera round-ups

TrustedReviews newsletter

Three of the best Mid range Digital Cameras