This is apparent with music played through Creative's own Zen MX player or an iPod touch, but you can also hear it with a stronger source, like an iBasso D2 operating as a USB DAC/headphone amp. On the plus side, the lightweight signature gives pop tracks like Justin Timberlake's LoveStoned or Take That's Greatest Day some real punch and energy, and there's plenty of scope to appreciate the detail in glossy, high-end productions.
Listen to Rilo Kiley's Under the Blacklight, and there's lots of nuance and tone in the vocals, and the guitars chime and shimmer, but when the bassline dives low, it gets slightly lost in the mix. The synth and vocal textures in the Prefuse 73 remix of Via Tania's Drift Away are pristine and beautiful, but without a thick bass the sound loses its warmth.
Forget about anything that needs a powerful bass to work. Help Somebody, from Maxwell's new R&B opus, BLACKSummer's night, sounds just too thin to be funky, While DJ Shadow's Fixed Income is - bluntly - a bit of a battering for the eardrums, the snare drums a bit too dominant in the mix. Nor are the AAs ideal for rock. Mastodon's Divinations fell pretty much flat, and the rolling bar-room rock of The Hold Steady's Stay Positive is all detail, no raucous presence.

The AAs fare better with more acoustic or folky music, lighter classical music and small group jazz, where that lovely crystalline high-end gets a chance to shine and basslines don't have such a crowded mix to get lost in, but as all-rounders the AAs aren't the best headphones I've heard. Nor is the soundstage as expansive as you'd expect from, say, a half-decent pair of over-the-ear headphones.
And this is all serious stuff, because at £169.95 (exclusive to Creative's online store), you've got a right to expect exceptional audio as well as exceptional design. As it is, at this price point Creative is going up against such big hitters as the Klipsch Custom 3s and Image X10s, not to mention Sennheiser's IE7s and IE8s and the Shure SE420s. Of course, not everyone finds an IEM comfortable, while full-sized 'phones aren't so ideal for active use. Given that, the AAs might find some takers, but I'd personally be tempted to buy a cheaper pair of sports earphones for exercise and, say, a pair of Grado SR80s or Audio Technica ATH-AD500s for home.
It's a shame. I want to love the Aurvana Airs, and I'm even willing to ignore the fact that they don't provide any noise isolation to speak of (making use on public transport a bit of a no-no). They're gorgeous looking, comfortable and well constructed, and I can't say enough how good they are for crisp, clear detail. Were the Aurvana Airs £100 or less, I'd probably be more willing to big them up. However, at the price they are, they really needed to deliver a more convincing all-round performance, sonically. If only they were as beautiful to listen to as they are to look at... oh well. I guess that's asking a bit too much.
Verdict
Stunning looks and superb engineering, but the sound isn't quite in the same league. Given the high price you could do better.





Comments
User reviews
Average user rating
0/10
Read more reviews >
5/10
0 out of 0 people found this review helpful
Creative Aurvana Air
30th August 2011, By suggul
I bought these headphones as I mainly use headphones in the gym and my commute to work, and liked the over-ear hooks, to prevent them falling out whilst exercising. However, I was tired of the uncultured, heavy sound of sports headphones - and their poor build quality. When I found these headphones going for £60 on the Creative website, I couldn't resist.
As the review states these are just stunning to look at. They look like items of jewellery, not audio equipment. At first glance, I didn't know whether to put them in my ears or make love to them. Those who say they're copies of the B&O's are misguided. Yes, the design is similar, but the Aurvana Air's are more delicate, and - with their highly-polished metal - more eye-catching. The great design extends to comfort - once on, these headphones won't fall off, even when pounding the treadmill. And - cliche though it is - they're so incredibly light, that you forget that you're wearing them
However, headphones aren't made for their looks alone, and I was disappointed by the sound quality from the off. Yes, it was crisper, more detailed and wonderfully light - 'airy', you might say - compared to cheaper, bass-heavy sports headphones, but the sound seriously lacked power. The volume is just not good enough - whether it's due to sound leakage from the open design I'm not sure. Even at top volume on my MP3 player, I struggle to hear songs clearly on the Tube and the treadmill. To it's credit, though, there is no sound distortion at the top volume levels at all - a revelation compared to cheaper headphones. The bass is sorely lacking, too. Now, I'm dead against an over-powering bassline, but with the Aurvana Air's the sound can often seem a bit weak, and unbalanced due to the lack of the bottom-end.
My biggest gripe with the Aurvana Air's is the build quality. With a product that cost close to £200 when launched, and will still set you back £60-70, I expected them to be really robust. However, within 2 months, the over-ear loops had come away from the main body of the headphone on both sides. I've contacted Creative about this, and they should take them back, but I shouldn't have to resort to that 2 months in.
Overall then, despite being gorgeous, extremely comfortable and producing a clear, detailed sound, the weak audio experience - with lack of bass - and poor build quality, means I regret buying the Creative Aurvana Air's.
Report abuse
To add your own review log in or sign up