Home / Cameras / Camera / Casio Exilim EX-H10 / Test Shots - ISO Performance

Casio Exilim EX-H10 - Test Shots - ISO Performance

By Cliff Smith

Reviewed:

Summary

Our Score:

8

User Score:

Over the next few pages we show a range of test shots. On this page the full size image at the minimum and maximum ISO settings have been reduced to let you see the full image, and a series of full resolution crops have taken from original images at a range of ISO settings to show the overall image quality. These pictures were taken indoors using reflected natural light.

----

This is the full frame at minimum ISO. As you can see the auto white balance hasn't really worked.

----

If you can ignore the colour cast, the actual quality is superb, with no noise at all.

----

Still nice ans smooth at 100 ISO.

----

Still no noise at 200 ISO.

----

400 ISO and still no real noise problems.

----

There is some noise at 800 ISO, but it is very well controlled.

----

Even at 1600 ISO the image quality is printable.

----

3200 ISO, and even here the image quality is far from disastrous.

----

This is the full frame at 3200 ISO.

---

miha

October 16, 2009, 1:07 pm

IQ score of 8/10 seems about right for a compact camera, however there are a few points to IQ that didn't get mentioned in the review and are bleeding obvious from what I can make out of sample shots and camera's specification:





- there's visible edge preserving smooth type of noise control applied on even the lowest ISO settings. Small detail is pretty much lost with it so forget about printing small crops out of original JPeGs.





- Lens might be good compared to latest Samsungs you reviewed, it is still a rather slow performer with 3.2-5.7 at 24-240mm range compared to similarly priced Panasonics (even certain Canons), especially at the farthest focal points and overall sharpness at any focal distance hardly impresses.





- Dynamic range is really not improved at all with "Extra Lighting" feature. At best, it is what the name suggests, about +1E stop sensor sensitivity increase. Highlights will get burnt out even more but you'd get a bit more of shadow detail out in a visible range JPeG compression won't flatten out.





All in all, it seems a fairly reasonable compact camera and all this won't matter much to a casual user on a family picnic. Shame about the white balance, tho I'd guess that's something Casio can mend with a new firmware update. Still, no replacement for my aging TZ5 :( What I'm waiting/searching for is close to LX3's image quality (even if on smaller resolution sensor, anything over or around 5MB is plenty if it would mean noise is better controlled) all-in-one in a pocket friendly priced and sized package and a fast, medium range lens. Too much to ask for?





Take care and thanks for making my morning coffee time more bearable with all the new and interesting reviews ;)

Charles Stephens

October 16, 2009, 7:28 pm

I have to totally agree with miha! These high range compacts just cannot tick the right baxes,time the manufacturers lowered their aspirations and produced compacts that put iq as a priority.

Williamn

October 17, 2009, 6:48 pm

Hi





Random question. Are there any compact cameras (or DSLRs) that come with an option for an external microphone?

ontheweb

October 21, 2009, 8:10 pm

Comparing this camera to a TZ5 is unfair, since the TZ5 a lot thicker and no where near as pocketable.

Cliff Smith

October 25, 2009, 8:34 am

Williamn - Some of the more advanced DSLRs that feature HD video recording can use external mics, specifically the Canon EOS 5D MkII, Panasonic Lumix GH1, Nikon D300s and D90, and the Pentax K-7. No compacts do though, at least as far as I know.

comments powered by Disqus