Canon PowerShot SX110 IS - Test Shots

Canon PowerShot SX110 IS - Test Shots - ISO Performance

Over the next few pages we show a range of test shots. On this page the full size image at the minimum and maximum ISO settings have been reduced to let you see the full image, and a series of full resolution crops have taken from original images at a range of ISO settings to show the overall image quality.

----

This is the full frame at the minimum sensitivity setting of 80 ISO.

----

At 80 ISO the image quality is niceand clean with good colour and sharp detail.

----

Much the same at 100 ISO.

----

There is a little noise visible at 200 ISO, but it's not enough to cause a problem.

----

At 400 ISO there is noise visible, but none of the uneven colour distortion usually seen at this level.

----

Most of the really fine detail has been lost at 800 ISO, but colour is still pretty good.

----

1600 ISO is just about usable in emergencies, but picture quality is pretty poor.

----

This is the full frame at 1600 ISO.

----

Comments

Please wait while we process your request

Please wait while we retrieve the user's information

Bio

Your bio is currently empty. Now is a great time to fill in your profile.

This profile is private.

This profile is only shared with friends.

This profile is under review.

We were unable to request friendship with this user.

We were unable to request friendship with this user. Are you logged in?

Your friendship request has been sent to this user.

We were unable to terminate friendship with this user.

We were unable to terminate friendship with this user. Are you logged in?

You are no longer friends with this user.

We were unable to ignore this user.

We were unable to ignore this user. Are you logged in?

This user is now ignored.

We were unable to stop ignoring this user.

We were unable to stop ignoring this user. Are you logged in?

This user is no longer ignored.

pluck_user_mp-abuse_too_long_err

23 comments

Sort:

Name withheld

JimmyDee

5:42 PM on 3 October, 2008

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore JimmyDee. Show Details Hide Details

Not surprized - the Canon P & S's are generally very good.

Score:

bobsta

12:05 PM on 4 October, 2008

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore bobsta. Show Details Hide Details

This puts me in a bit of a pickle as I wanted to get the Panasonic DMC-TZ5.

AndyfromVA

1:23 PM on 4 October, 2008

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore AndyfromVA. Show Details Hide Details

Looks like an excellent camera. What I also like about it is that it's thinner and more pocketable than the SX100. It's a credible alternative to the larger, bulkier SLR-like superzooms.

4:36 PM on 4 October, 2008

Canon SX110 or Panasonic TZ5 - tough choice?

TomMacFarlane1

8:16 PM on 10 October, 2008

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore TomMacFarlane1. Show Details Hide Details

I currently use the SX100 and it is a superb camera. I have also used the Panasonic TZ3. All I can say, JimmyDee, is go for the Canon. This review - and in particular the images - confirm Canon's superiority. With the SX110 you'll get a slightly better spec than the SX100.

Ross1

2:05 PM on 25 October, 2008

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Ross1. Show Details Hide Details

Like Bobsta and JimmyDee, I too was considering the Panasonic TZ5 but before I took the leap into Digital with my Olympus C-750 I had used a Canon A1 35mm for years, and I mean YEARS with not one camera fault showing up. Canon and Nikon lenses are the best in the world while maintaining some balance between cost and common sense.

I therefore plucked up the courage of my convictions, and after reading the spec sheets and pre-launch reviews of the SX110 I abandoned the idea of going for the TZ5 - and am so glad I did.

What you get with Canon's SX110 is years of photographic experience - this beast was not as easy (for me) to get to grips with at first, but after a couple of days, the menu systems became pretty obvious in most things. One thing that surprised me was the minimum aperture is F8 which I didn't realise beforehand - but as most lenses give their best performance at f8 or f5.6 this is not a problem unless you want long time exposures, eg to blur moving water, while using a tripod - 3/4 to 2 seconds etc. I still have my cokin Neutral Density filters for such situations so its not a problem.

In every other respect, the camera outperforms in every area when compared to my Olympus C-750 which I sold recently. Better than this, it outperforms in every area of my expectations - the sharpness of the lens, through the range, is incredible. The optical image stabilisation is done using ceramic guides which tweak the lens at the moment of exposure - when your back is against the wall, this gives you approx two stops extra hand holding stability - and of course, on a tripod at full zoom the IS completely secures a sharp image for you.

Macro, which is one of my great interests, performs stunningly, and the colours (try shooting flowers - wow!) are correctly saturated leaving little for photoshop to do.

I am SO glad I gave up on the Panasonic and bought this (3 weeks ago) and had I known how good this was I would have gone for the SX100 last year - still, just as well I suppose, the 3" LCD makes it an even better image making machine - If I may add, I bought a Manfrotto Modo Maxi tripod with integrated head - this has a 'leg spread' setting where the tripod head is about six inches from the ground (the tripod centre column unscrews just under the head to allow this to work) If you are into macro, grab one now - I paid about 45 quid which, given the quality and lightness (under a kg) is great - its only suitable for light cameras and partners my SX110 brilliantly!

So, go out and buy an SX110 now, or, next year when they replace it (SX120?) buy that instead!

Happy photography, Ross

xeos

12:56 AM on 14 November, 2008

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore xeos. Show Details Hide Details

On the whole I really like the SX110. I feel that the only real downside is the high CCD noise when using high ISO settings. Unfortunately, in low light situations this is relatively necessary if you shoot indoors and try to use the zoom at all (see examples here http://digicamtech.blogspot.com/2008/10/canon-sx110is-review-10x-zoom-lens.html).

Nicola

9:54 AM on 27 January, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Nicola. Show Details Hide Details

Is it all right using it with rechargeable Ni-MH AA batteries, Sony or Sanyo 2100 or 2700 mAh for instance?

5:47 AM on 31 January, 2009

Yes it is. I bought it a few days ago, the user guide mentions Ni-MH batteries, it works just fine (unlike a Metz flash years ago, 45 CT1 I believe, the version with alkaline batteries power would be damaged if used with rechargeable batteries).

I just checked out my first tests, many of them in dawn or crepuscule, hendheld and tripod, just _absolutely_great_ camera for the money, I'm still surprised. I was considering it as a family/travel camera but I see now why the vendor was asking if I'm going to use it for job.

I've always had cameras with manual controls and I'm very glad I didn't renounce having them this time, I think they just make easy a lot of otherwise difficult or impossible situations.

So thanks a lot for your comments and thanks to trustedreviews for really helping in the choice.

(BTW, I also had quite similar opinions from expert friends about this camera and its competitors.)

chrissharp

2:51 PM on 9 February, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore chrissharp. Show Details Hide Details

Does anyone know if this uses the same softwaree as the SX100?

regards

Chris

Please wait while we file your abuse report.

We're sorry. We were unable to report abuse at this time.

We limit the number of reactions an individual user can submit over a given period for quality reasons. You have currently reached that limit. Please try resubmitting your abuse report again later.

Comment is too long. Enter 500 characters or less.