Canon PowerShot S90 - Test Shots

Canon PowerShot S90 - Test Shots - ISO Performance

Over the next few pages we show a range of test shots. On this page the full size image at the minimum and maximum ISO settings have been reduced to let you see the full image, and a series of full resolution crops have taken from original images at a range of ISO settings to show the overall image quality. These pictures were taken indoors using reflected natural light.

----

This is the full frame at 80 ISO.

----

Compare the image quality at the minimum 80 ISO setting with the results from the Panasonix LX3.

----

Image quality is excellent at 100 ISO.

-----

Still no problems at 200 ISO.

----

Good results at 400 ISO, with just a hint of noise.

----

Printable results at 800 ISO.

----

Detail is starting to disappear at 1600 ISO, but colour balance remains good.

----

3200 ISO is looking a bit fuzzy, but I've seen a lot worse.

----

This is the full frame at 3200 ISO.

----

Comments

Please wait while we process your request

Please wait while we retrieve the user's information

Bio

Your bio is currently empty. Now is a great time to fill in your profile.

This profile is private.

This profile is only shared with friends.

This profile is under review.

We were unable to request friendship with this user.

We were unable to request friendship with this user. Are you logged in?

Your friendship request has been sent to this user.

We were unable to terminate friendship with this user.

We were unable to terminate friendship with this user. Are you logged in?

You are no longer friends with this user.

We were unable to ignore this user.

We were unable to ignore this user. Are you logged in?

This user is now ignored.

We were unable to stop ignoring this user.

We were unable to stop ignoring this user. Are you logged in?

This user is no longer ignored.

pluck_user_mp-abuse_too_long_err

16 comments

Sort:

Name withheld

joose

4:54 PM on 19 November, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore joose. Show Details Hide Details

Just one thing I want to mention before the comments fill up is the lack of any grip on this camera. I tried it out and it was as slippery as a bar of wet soap! Canon should take a leaf out of Ricoh's book here and put some rubber around it!

Score:

jopey

8:05 PM on 19 November, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore jopey. Show Details Hide Details

This is priced way too close the Lumix G1. There is no reason for it to be so expensive. No compact camera should be more than £200-250 these days.

Noodles

12:26 AM on 20 November, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Noodles. Show Details Hide Details

I know I shouldn't get hung up on ratings, but how on earth does a near £400 P&S camera made completely of plastic, with a "slightly confusing" and awkward" control bezel, an "awful" rear dial, and not having any kind of viewfinder (not even an optional one) get 9/10 for build quality, and a perfect 10 for features?!

Luis

3:48 AM on 20 November, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Luis. Show Details Hide Details

This looks like the best small compact available today, though for the price it does seem strange that they didn't add HD video, for example. I also with the lens would be more like f/2.0-f/3.8, because as they are they only have an advantage at the widest angle (I think at 60mm. equiv. it's already f/3.5 max, similar to other compacts).

Ah, and I've seen the lens produce a very big barrel distortion at wide angle. It is the software that corrects it.

Wedge

7:41 AM on 20 November, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Wedge. Show Details Hide Details

@Noodles It says on page one that it the S90 has a metal body.

I've been nursing my S70 for ages because there wasn't a decent Canon replacement. Now I guess I can relax a bit as this looks ideal and a nice step up spec wise.

CliffSmith

11:06 AM on 20 November, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore CliffSmith. Show Details Hide Details

Noodles - Sorry if I wasn't completely clear on this point, but the body is mostly metal, it's just the top and bottom panels that are plastic, and they're still quite strong and well fitted.

Mircea

11:58 AM on 20 November, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Mircea. Show Details Hide Details

@Cliff: If you were to buy one today for yourself, what would you pick - the S90 or the LX3?

Spec-wise, the LX3 has the edge with the ultra-wide 24mm lens, on-the-fly AR change (including real 16:9) and 720p video, plus the outstanding build quality. The shorter zoom doesn't really bother me. Distortion is present on both cameras, but it can be fixed in post-processing, so no big deal. Based on your samples, I would say that image quality at base ISO (up to ISO 400) is better on the Panasonic, but the Canon seems to have the edge at ISO 800-3200.

I really want to buy one of these cameras as a Christmas gift (for myself :D) and at the moment I would go for the LX3. Please advise.

1:40 PM on 20 November, 2009

Teaches me not to skim read the first page to get to the juicy bits!

I still think it's a ridiculously overpriced style over substance camera, with terrible handling, and one that looks more obsolete by the day, with the hugely successful Micro 4/3rds and APS-C compacts swallowing up it's market share...

3:15 PM on 20 November, 2009

@Mircea: I'm also thinking about one of these two cameras. You summed up the pros and cons really good, but I look at it this way: At ISO 100-400 the LX3 might have a small advantage, but this is very small, hardly noticeable. Besides, at ISO 100-400 many cameras can have a similar IQ to these ones. What should set these cameras apart from the rest is high ISO / low light performance, and there I've seen the Canon having a very big advantage. The 24mm wide angle is great, but 28mm is not too much worse. 720p is nice too, but using MJPEG codec (vs. H.264). The LX3's lens is a bit faster at 45-60mm, which is good too, but being limited to 60mm is a noticeable disadvantage (vs. 105mm).

So the two advantages of the Canon (high ISO performance and 105mm zoom) do seem more practical to me than the advantages of the LX3 (which are all small compared to the Canon).

Anyway, I think both cameras are a great buy.

10:46 PM on 25 November, 2009

Please note that I've made a correction to the review. The S90 does in fact have optical image stabilisation, not sensor shift as I had been led to believe. Apologies for the confusion.

Please wait while we file your abuse report.

We're sorry. We were unable to report abuse at this time.

We limit the number of reactions an individual user can submit over a given period for quality reasons. You have currently reached that limit. Please try resubmitting your abuse report again later.

Comment is too long. Enter 500 characters or less.