Home / Computing / Peripheral / Acer easyStore H340 2TB

Acer easyStore H340 2TB review




  • Recommended by TR

1 of 7

Acer easyStore H340 2TB
  • Acer easyStore H340 2TB
  • Acer easyStore H340 2TB
  • Acer easyStore H340 2TB
  • Acer easyStore H340 2TB
  • Acer easyStore H340 2TB
  • Acer easyStore H340 2TB
  • Aspire H340-M Network Storage Server (1 x Intel Atom 230 - 2 TB 2 x 1 TB - USB, RJ-45 Network)


Our Score:


If you'll take Microsoft's word for it, sometimes a mere NAS device isn't good enough. No, rather you need a Windows Home Server in your, well, home, taking care of your backup, media sharing and remote file access needs. The Acer easyStore H340 is one such system purporting to offer any household willing to welcome it - it's a simple, but powerful, centralised storage repository able to cope with anything likely to be thrown at it.

Leaving aside its operating system, the easyStore H340 isn’t so different from many other NAS devices we've looked at. It has a single USB port on the front and a quartet on the rear, alongside an eSATA port and a Gigabit Ethernet port. A snip under £400 will net an Acer easyStore H340 pre-fitted with two 1TB hard drives, leaving two more of its four bays free. These are, incidentally, hot-swappable.

So far so usual, and the H340's 200 x 180 x 210mm dimensions and 4.5Kg (drive-less) weight aren't particularly outstanding either. Internally, things are a touch more interesting: a 1.6GHz Intel Atom 230 CPU coupled to 2GB of RAM should give the easyStore H340 a bit more poke than many NAS devices in its class, even accounting for Windows Home Server needing more processing power than the custom Linux OSs used by other NAS boxes.

While I remain unconvinced that an Atom-powered netbook could ever replace my trusty Vaio TZ, I certainly can't fault the performance of the Atom CPU powering the H340 - at no point did I find the system unresponsive. File transfer speeds were in line with expectation as well. A standard Windows file transfer of an 879MB file returned a write speed of 26.9MB/s and a read speed of 30.7MB/s, with FTP performance even better, giving 36MB/s write and 38.6MB/s read, over the office Gigabit Ethernet network.

Atom-powered NAS devices are not a particularly scare resource, however, so primarily it is Windows Home Server that stands as the selling point of this one. Fortunately, as we've already discovered through the Tranquil T7-HSA Home Server and Fujitsu Siemens Scaleo Home Server 1900, to name just a couple of systems, WHS isn't half bad. It has a few quirks and even some short-fallings, but in a home network configured to make use of its advantages those will likely go unnoticed.

The foremost of Windows Home Server's, and thus the easyStore h340's, issues is the complete lack of RAID support. In fact, WHS resides on the primary disk installed in the H340, in a 20GB partition all of its own, with the rest of the drive allocated to storage duties and backup on the server side is taken care of through simple duplication of folders onto another drive.

In an ideal world, no end user will ever notice this - it all happens in the background - but it's worth being aware of. The biggest risk is that if the primary partition fails and takes the server with it. You'll then have to replace that hard drive and use the recovery disc provided to restore your data, where other systems would enable you to simply replace the dead hard drive with a working one, then get on with things while the RAID array rebuilds in the background.


March 11, 2010, 10:59 pm

No RAID support? No sale.

Presumably, as its Windows based, you would also have to apply service packs, run antivirus, etc., or do Acer provide net updates?


March 12, 2010, 12:29 am

Nice review of a decent product.

Can't help thinking that Acer's missed a trick.

HP's version of this is similarly priced, looks far nicer. Features wise, I can't see Acer having done anything to differtiate itself from the HP.

The HP is now several years old. I was hoping that a giant like Acer would have come up with something more than a 'me too' product.


March 12, 2010, 4:13 am

@Prem: Your similarly priced (but "beautiful" :-) HP comes with only a single 1TB drive, while this comes with two.

Anyone scared of WHS's lack of RAID should note that there is a thriving Linux-on-H340 community (indeed, if anyone wanted to replicate WHS's "safety by duplicating" method, do a google search for "project greyhole" -- still in its infancy but looking good.)


March 12, 2010, 4:48 am

Be careful with the installation of any software requiring administrative privilages using Romote Desktop as this provides a pseudo admin environment only and can cause software installation problems. There is a Micorsoft produced Whitepaper covering this 'feature' - just search MS. VNC or similar remote access offering true console replication do not suffer from this problem


March 12, 2010, 8:12 pm

Windows on a NAS? You've got to be kidding.


March 13, 2010, 5:40 am

Might want to hold off for a few months..



March 15, 2010, 5:25 pm

@gurnaik and the RAID concerned - I was obsessed with the idea that these WHS boxes don't have RAID until I did a bit of googling:


And now I'm no longer worried. Basically Drive extender has various benefits such as:

-use lots of different drive sizes/brands

-rescue data by just plugging drives into a PC

-only duplicate the data you want (perfect if you image your DVDs for convenient streaming)

The real risk is the loss of the system partition which is why I bought a Tranquil SQA-5H SAFE. It's WHS but with a mini-RAID ('SAFE') kit in one of the drive bays (two 2.5" in RAID1) taking up one 3.5" bay, for the OS. So best of both worlds. They now sell the SAFE separately too.


March 16, 2010, 6:08 pm

this seems far superior to any NAS and far more flexable, but it doesnt need antivirus does it?

comments powered by Disqus